Skip to content
BREAKING Read more

Push Notifications

Get notified when new briefings drop and when breaking news hits — even when the site isn't open.

Saved Stories

Keyboard Shortcuts

Previous day ←
Next day →
Open bookmarks B
Toggle dark mode D
Close / dismiss Esc
Subscribe S
Show shortcuts ?

The Daily Brief

Today's Briefing Live Updates
Last refreshed: loading...
FTSE 100 --
S&P 500 --
Brent Crude --
GBP/USD --
Gold --
EUR/GBP --
UK 10Y Gilt --
VIX --
Bitcoin --
US 10Y --
(vs. prev. close)
✎ Curated Briefing · Edited at 08:00 & 18:00
☼

Morning Briefing

Tuesday 26 May 2026 — 08:15 BST

What It Means For You

  • US Central Command launched overnight strikes against Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps mine-laying boats in the Strait of Hormuz and a surface-to-air missile site at Bandar Abbas, threatening the fragile ceasefire even as Iranian negotiators arrived in Doha for fresh talks. CENTCOM spokesperson Captain Tim Hawkins said American forces “conducted self-defense strikes in southern Iran today to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces”. Targets “included missile launch sites and Iranian boats attempting to emplace mines”. Two IRGC vessels were eliminated. US officials said the strikes do not signal the collapse of the framework deal.
  • Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, and the central bank chief travelled to Doha overnight for fresh talks with Qatar’s prime minister and US counterparts on frozen financial assets and the wider deal. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in Jaipur the Strait of Hormuz has to be open “one way or the other”. “There were some talks going on in Qatar today, so we’ll see if we can make progress. I think it’s a lot of talking back and forth going on about specific language in the initial document, so it’ll take a few days,” Rubio told reporters. President Donald Trump on Monday: “He’s either going to make a good deal or no deal.”
  • The FTSE 100 opened up 0.8% at 10,546 this morning, playing catch-up after the Spring Bank Holiday as London investors absorbed Monday’s oil-price moves. Brent crude was at $98.21 a barrel, up 0.7% on Monday’s lows but down sharply from Friday’s $104.22 close. Sterling firmed to $1.3478 against the dollar, up from Friday’s $1.3441. Oil majors led the FTSE gains — BP up 2.7%, Shell up 2.0% — with Kingfisher, Sunbelt Rentals and Endeavour Mining also on the leaderboard. Bond markets are pricing in lower Bank of England rates as the imported-inflation pressure eases.

GEO Geopolitical

CENTCOM Strikes IRGC Mine-Laying Boats and Bandar Abbas SAM Site Overnight

US Central Command spokesperson Captain Tim Hawkins said American forces “conducted self-defense strikes in southern Iran today to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces”. The targets “included missile launch sites and Iranian boats attempting to emplace mines”. Two Iranian boats were caught laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz, a senior US official said; the US military eliminated both IRGC vessels and also struck a surface-to-air missile site in Bandar Abbas that Hawkins said was targeting US warplanes. “US Central Command continues to defend our forces while using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire,” Hawkins said.

Dive deeper
Bandar Abbas is Iran’s primary naval station. Multiple reports said at least two boats linked to the IRGC were destroyed during the operation. Several explosions were reported close to Sirik and Jask, two coastal cities along the strait and Gulf of Oman, earlier on Monday. The strikes are the most serious US kinetic action since the April 7 ceasefire began — and the strongest signal yet that the US naval blockade remains operational pending a signed agreement. US officials said the strikes do not indicate the collapse of the framework deal currently under negotiation. The Iranian mine-laying activity — if confirmed — is itself a ceasefire violation that the US framing answered with a proportional, “defensive” strike package designed to preserve the negotiating track.

Iran Delegation in Doha for Fresh Talks — Foreign Minister, Parliament Speaker, Central Bank Chief

Iran sent a senior negotiating delegation to Doha overnight that includes Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, and the central bank chief, for fresh talks with Qatar’s prime minister and US counterparts. The Doha track is focused on frozen Iranian financial assets and the wider memorandum-of-understanding architecture. The strikes overnight in southern Iran came as the delegation arrived — framing the talks against a backdrop of continued US military leverage on the Hormuz mine-laying threat.

Dive deeper
The composition of the Iranian delegation is significant. Including the central bank chief signals the sanctions-relief and frozen-funds dimension is now a primary track. Araghchi has held diplomatic calls over recent days with European and regional counterparts, the United Nations Secretary General António Guterres, and counterparts in Turkey, Iraq, Qatar and Oman. The Qatari channel runs alongside the Pakistani-led mediation, which delivered the “short but highly productive” Munir-Pezeshkian-Qalibaf-Araghchi Tehran visit on Saturday. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir also visited Tehran on Sunday to push for the framework deal’s adoption.

Rubio in Jaipur — Hormuz Must Be Open “One Way Or The Other”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters in Jaipur, during a visit to India, that the Strait of Hormuz must be open “one way or the other” following the overnight strikes. “There were some talks going on in Qatar today, so we’ll see if we can make progress. I think it’s a lot of talking back and forth going on about specific language in the initial document, so it’ll take a few days,” Rubio said. President Donald Trump told reporters on Monday: “The president’s expressed his desire to make it. He’s either going to make a good deal or no deal.”

Dive deeper
The Rubio “one way or the other” framing is the strongest US-side language yet linking the Hormuz reopening to the threat of force. It echoes Trump’s Memorial Day Truth Social post — “a great and meaningful deal… or there will be no deal” — and confirms that the US has prepared the kinetic option alongside the negotiating track. Rubio repeated the US position that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon and must turn over its highly enriched uranium, and the Strait of Hormuz must be opened. The US blockade on Iranian ports remains “in full force and effect until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed”, per Trump’s Sunday Truth Social post.

Iran “Stalling” to Normalise Hormuz Control; “Deal or Force” Binary Holds

One of Iran’s primary negotiating objectives is to secure sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz — an objective more important to Tehran than fee revenue from merchant vessels. Iran is likely stalling and delaying the negotiations process deliberately, because the protraction of the current situation serves Iran’s interests by normalising its de facto control of transit through the strait. The strait will not return to normal without either a deal that ends Iranian control or a US-led military operation that forces the strait open. Recognition of Iranian claims of sovereignty is both unacceptable and fails to accomplish a return to normal. The binary the international community now faces is “deal or force”.

Dive deeper
Iran likely sees two paths to controlling the strait. First, Iranian control could be officially recognised by the United States through an agreement. Other countries would probably oppose such recognition, but changing the new status quo would be extremely challenging. Second, Iran could maintain the current situation by firing missiles or drones at ships that fail to heed Iranian demands — or, as last night’s episode demonstrates, by attempting to lay fresh mines in the strait. Very few countries will approve of Iranian threats, but stopping Iranian coercion will require the use of force or an agreement that formally ends Iranian efforts to assert sovereignty over the strait. If negotiations do not lead rapidly to an agreement to reopen the strait under the previous, internationally recognised transit scheme, it will be necessary to resort to force.

Baghaei — “Large Portion” of Issues Resolved, Signing Still Not Imminent

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said on Monday that conclusions have been reached on a large portion of issues, but “to say that this means the signing of an agreement is imminent — no one can make such a claim”. Baghaei said the memorandum of understanding does not include specifics about the management of the Strait of Hormuz and that any fees Iran charges “will not be presented as tolls”. IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News Agency said the United States is “still obstructing” parts of the potential deal, including Tehran’s demand for the release of frozen funds.

Dive deeper
The Baghaei “not presented as tolls” phrasing is the operational reframing of the Iran-Oman fee discussion: Iran is reframing fees as “services” or “management charges” rather than tolls, while maintaining the underlying right to collect them. The framing is illegal under international maritime law in either form. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, whose office released a statement over the weekend, said: “We remain ready for talks, but the experience of past negotiations with the US forces us to exercise the utmost caution.” The Doha talks are now the operational forum for the “few days” window Rubio described, after which either a memorandum is signed or the framework collapses back into the “deal or force” binary.

UK UK Domestic Politics

FTSE 100 Opens Up 0.8% Post-Bank-Holiday; Oil Majors Lead, Sterling at $1.3478

The FTSE 100 opened up 79 points at 10,546 by 08:12 BST, playing catch-up after the Spring Bank Holiday closure on Monday. Oil majors led the gains: BP rose 2.7% after reporting first-quarter profit that exceeded expectations on stronger oil prices; Shell climbed 2.0%. Kingfisher, Sunbelt Rentals, Endeavour Mining and Glencore were also on the leaderboard. Melrose, Auto Trader, Vodafone and BP-laggards lagged. Brent crude was at $98.21 a barrel, up 0.7% on Monday’s lows but down sharply from Friday’s $104.22 close. Sterling firmed to $1.3478 against the dollar.

Dive deeper
European bonds were 9-to-12 basis points lower across the curve yesterday and US 10-year Treasuries reopened five basis points lower after the long weekend. UK 10-year gilts are reopening this morning into a market that has priced in lower oil-driven inflation and a continued Bank of England rate-cut path. The Reeves cost-of-living package this week — the cancellation of the 5p fuel-duty rise, VAT cuts on summer attractions and children’s meals, £350 million critical chemicals resilience fund, £120 million ceramics support, and the removal of import tariffs from 100 food items — lands into a substantively easier macro backdrop than the brief was drafted for. The next test is whether the Doha talks deliver a signed memorandum this week or break down into renewed strikes.

Carns Visits RFA Lyme Bay in Gibraltar — UK-France Mine-Clearing Operation Stands Ready

Armed Forces Minister Al Carns took a small group of reporters to visit the RFA Lyme Bay at Gibraltar yesterday as it prepares for a possible international operation, led by the United Kingdom and France, to secure the Strait of Hormuz. The amphibious landing vessel was being loaded with ammunition and mine-hunting sea drones equipped with sonar. Hundreds of British sailors are waiting to be deployed for a mine-clearing mission — only once a peace agreement is reached. Cmdr Gemma Britton, in charge of the Royal Navy’s Mine and Threat Exploitation Group, said Iran could have a “huge” variety of mines throughout the strait — rocket-propelled, cabled, or sea-bed mines triggered by sound, movement or light.

Dive deeper
The priority for the Royal Navy mine-clearing mission would be to clear a transit lane in the strait to allow around 700 ships to leave, Cmdr Britton said. A lane flowing in the opposite direction would then be cleared to allow ships to enter. Clearing the entire strait could take months or years. A US official told reporters that the US has not found or destroyed any mines in the strait, nor have any ships been damaged — though last night’s CENTCOM strike statement that two IRGC boats were “attempting to emplace mines” complicates that picture. The Carns visit is the most operationally concrete UK signal yet that British naval forces are prepared to participate in the post-agreement Hormuz reopening — and gives Sir Keir Starmer’s defence platform a forward-deployed dimension at a moment when his domestic-political position is contested.

Streeting “Won’t Fight Burnham” if Makerfield Wins; Ten-Week Coronation Timetable Emerges

Wes Streeting is likely to abandon his bid for the Labour leadership and fall in behind Andy Burnham if the Greater Manchester mayor wins the Makerfield by-election, senior allies believe. Figures organising for the former health secretary said there is an emerging feeling that “no one can beat Andy” if Burnham makes it back to parliament and launches a challenge against Sir Keir Starmer. A YouGov poll of Labour members shows Burnham beating Streeting 80% to 10% in a potential leadership race that does not involve Starmer. Those closest to Streeting are pushing for a “ten-week timetable” — a four-week by-election campaign followed by a six-week Labour leadership contest.

Dive deeper
One Streeting ally: “The consensus among the team is that if Andy wins Makerfield, it turns to bargaining for the best possible secretary of state position. If he loses, that’s a different matter.” Another senior Streeting ally said: “I don’t think it’s clear cut. If Andy wins the by-election it’s obviously a real success. But where he stands on a whole range of issues is unknown and there’s clearly a case for having a good open process where we figure out.” Some Burnham supporters have been making the case for skipping a leadership contest altogether and going straight to a coronation should Burnham win in Makerfield. Streeting himself said publicly he had “no regrets” about resigning from government and backed Burnham in the by-election.

Reeves Rearguard Holds — “Chancellor Question Almost as Important as PM”

Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s backbench-lobbying push continues this week. Reeves has told friends she would like to stay in the chancellorship even under a new prime minister, and her allies are urging MPs to back her if Sir Keir Starmer is replaced later this year. One Labour MP close to the chancellor: “The biggest fear for the bond markets and the unions is Ed Miliband. I am concerned that we may lose everything if a new leader sacrifices the chancellor for promises and new alliances they are currently forging with MPs who fancy the job for themselves.” The chancellor question is now “almost as important as that for prime minister”.

Dive deeper
Friends of Reeves believe there is a world in which she survives the transition to a Burnham premiership precisely because it would reassure the markets. The 10-year gilt yield is at 5.02%, well off the 5.18% peak Friday week; sterling has firmed; and lower oil prices are easing the imported-inflation pressure that has been the central political-economy variable through the war. The Reeves cost-of-living package this week — fuel duty cancellation, VAT cuts, food tariff removals, and £120 million ceramics support — lands into a measurably easier macro backdrop than the brief was drafted for. Burnham’s allies have suggested Ed Miliband as his pick for chancellor; Reeves’s allies counter that Miliband “would not be trusted by the bond markets”.

Burnham Campaign Continues Through Bank Holiday Weekend; Kenyon Test Sharpens

Andy Burnham’s Makerfield campaign continued through the Spring Bank Holiday weekend, with the Greater Manchester mayor positioning himself as the change candidate against both Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon and the cabinet-supported Starmer leadership. Kenyon, a local plumber and army reservist who came within 5,399 votes of Josh Simons in the 2024 general election, has framed the contest as “Plucky Plumber” versus “Open Borders Burnham”. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has called the by-election a “David versus Goliath battle” and has thrown senior Reform UK figures into the constituency for the four-week campaign sprint to 18 June.

Dive deeper
Burnham has appeared on BBC Radio Manchester taking questions from presenter Mike Sweeney and audience members; Kenyon and the Liberal Democrat candidate Jake Austin (Stockport councillor) are also slated for the same series. The Conservative candidate Michael Winstanley last stood in Makerfield in 1997. Reform UK comfortably won every ward in the Makerfield constituency at the 7 May local elections; Burnham himself won 66% of the vote in Wigan in the 2024 Greater Manchester mayoral election. Pollsters have signalled that having Burnham running significantly boosts Labour’s chances of retaining the seat, but the contest remains tough. The four-week countdown is now the operational testing ground for the “ten-week timetable” coronation framework Streeting’s allies are pushing.
One To Read

Iran-US War Live: America Launches Fresh Airstrikes on Iranian Missile Launch Sites and Mine-Laying Boats

The Independent · The single most important news event since the framework deal surfaced over the weekend: US Central Command launched overnight strikes on IRGC mine-laying boats in the Strait of Hormuz and a surface-to-air missile site at Bandar Abbas, even as Iranian negotiators arrived in Doha. The strikes are the strongest US-side leverage signal yet that the “deal or force” binary is real. Rubio’s Jaipur framing — Hormuz must be open “one way or the other” — confirms the kinetic option remains on the table even as the diplomatic track in Doha continues.
☽

Evening Briefing

Monday 25 May 2026 — 18:30 BST

What It Means For You

  • Brent crude crashed below $100 a barrel for the first time since 7 May, settling at $97.53 in thin holiday trade — down 5.8% on the day — as oil markets priced in the prospect that an Iran-US deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz could be announced this week. President Donald Trump said in an early Memorial Day Truth Social post: his administration will either reach “a great and meaningful” deal with Iran “or there will be no deal”. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said yesterday an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz could be announced as soon as today. Gold rose 1% as the dollar softened.
  • Iran continues to push back on the US framing. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said today the memorandum of understanding does not include specifics about the management of the Strait of Hormuz and that any fees Iran charges “will not be presented as tolls”. The IRGC-affiliated Tasnim news agency said the United States “is still obstructing” parts of the potential deal, including Tehran’s demand for the release of frozen funds. Iran has acknowledged agreement on many points but says the signing of a deal is not imminent.
  • UK and US markets were closed today for the Spring Bank Holiday and Memorial Day, leaving global trade thin and volatility high. The Brent move — if it holds — would translate into materially lower UK pump prices in the coming weeks: Brent at $97 is roughly 23% below the post-war peak of $126. Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s cost-of-living package this week — cancelling a planned 5p rise in fuel duty, VAT cut from 20% to 5% on summer attraction tickets, removal of import tariffs from 100 food items, and a £120 million ceramics support package — would compound the relief if the oil-price move proves durable.

GEO Geopolitical

Trump — “Great and Meaningful” Deal “Or There Will Be No Deal”

President Donald Trump said in an early Memorial Day Truth Social post that his administration will either reach “a great and meaningful” deal with Iran to end the war, “or there will be no deal”. The post hardened the tone of yesterday’s “not to rush” framing into a binary: a signed agreement on US terms or no agreement at all. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said yesterday an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz could be announced as soon as today — though the US administration also confirmed the signing of any deal is not imminent.

Dive deeper
Trump on Sunday also wrote: “If I make a deal with Iran, it will be a good and proper one… So don’t listen to the losers, who are critical about something they know nothing about.” The Memorial Day “great and meaningful” framing is calibrated for the US domestic political audience: it pre-positions Trump to walk away from any agreement that does not deliver visible US wins on Hormuz reopening, US naval-blockade lifting and Iranian uranium handling. The Pakistani-led mediation channel remains the operational diplomatic track; further talks are expected to take place after the Eid holiday ends on Friday if the US accepts the current memorandum.

Brent Crashes Below $100 — 5.8% Drop on Iran-Deal Optimism, Thin Holiday Trade

Brent crude futures dropped $6.01, or 5.8%, to $97.53 a barrel by 11:25 GMT, the lowest level since 7 May. West Texas Intermediate fell 5.9% to $90.95. Both contracts hit lows not seen in over two weeks as traders unwound the war-risk premium linked to the Strait of Hormuz. UK and US markets were closed for the Spring Bank Holiday and Memorial Day, leaving trade thinner and volatility higher than usual. Gold prices jumped 1% as the dollar softened. Traders are weighing how much Middle East supply shock remains priced in if talks make material progress this week.

Dive deeper
Brent finished Friday at $103.54 after a sharp weekly loss of 5.48% for Brent and 8.37% for WTI. Phil Flynn, senior analyst at Price Futures Group, called the pace of news “hard to keep up” with. The main risk remains the Strait of Hormuz. Before fighting began, about 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments transited the strait; current volumes are a small fraction of that. ING analysts wrote in a note to clients: “There appears to have been some tempering of optimism. Obviously, the big unknown is how the US and Iran will resolve their differences on Iran’s nuclear program.” Brent at $84-90 would be the price level consistent with a confirmed, signed deal that reopens the strait at scale; the current $97 level reflects partial optimism with substantial residual risk.

Baghaei — MoU Does Not Include Hormuz Specifics; Fees “Not Presented As Tolls”

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said today that the memorandum of understanding under negotiation does not include specifics about the management of the Strait of Hormuz. Baghaei added that any fees Iran charges “will not be presented as tolls”. The IRGC-affiliated Tasnim news agency said the United States “is still obstructing” parts of the potential deal, including Tehran’s demand for the release of frozen funds. Iran has acknowledged agreement with the United States on many points but says the signing of a deal is not imminent — and that the proposal under discussion does not include immediate concessions on the nuclear issue.

Dive deeper
The Baghaei “not presented as tolls” phrasing is the operational reframing of the Iran-Oman fee discussion: Iran is reframing fees as “services” or “management charges” rather than tolls, while maintaining the underlying right to collect them. The framing is illegal under international maritime law in either form. The Tasnim “US still obstructing” line is the Iranian counter-pressure to Trump’s Sunday “don’t rush” framing: Iran is signalling that if the US pushes too hard on uranium or sequencing, Tehran will walk away. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held a series of diplomatic calls over the weekend with European and regional counterparts and the United Nations Secretary General António Guterres.

Three-Stage Architecture Holds — Hormuz First, Sanctions Later, 60-Day Nuclear Window

The proposed three-stage framework remains the operational template: formally ending the war, resolving the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz, and launching a 30-day window for negotiations on a broader agreement — which can be extended to 60 days for nuclear-programme talks. Under the emerging agreement, the Strait of Hormuz would gradually reopen in parallel with the US ending its blockade of Iranian ports. The US would allow Iran to sell oil through sanctions waivers, with sanctions relief and the release of Iran’s frozen funds negotiated during the 60-day period. Sanctions relief is contingent on the strait being fully functional, not just declared open.

Dive deeper
The conditional sequencing — Hormuz first, then everything else — is the operational architecture of the proposed memorandum of understanding. A senior Trump administration official described the approach yesterday as “relief for performance”: allowing Iran to trade oil would also free up the global oil market by unblocking the strait. Iran would commit not to pursue a nuclear weapon and to enter negotiations on giving up its highly enriched uranium stockpile and pausing new enrichment. President Trump told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the weekend that he will not sign any final agreement without conditions that Iran dismantle its entire nuclear programme and remove all enriched uranium from the country.

Iran “Stalling” Deliberately to Normalise Hormuz Control; “Deal or Force” Remains the Binary

One of Iran’s primary negotiating objectives is to secure sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz — an objective more important to Tehran than the fee revenue from merchant vessels. Iran is likely stalling and delaying the negotiations process deliberately, because the protraction of the current situation serves Iran’s interests by normalising its de facto control of transit through the strait. The strait will not return to normal without either a deal that ends Iranian control or a US-led military operation that forces the strait open. Recognition of Iranian claims of sovereignty is both unacceptable and fails to accomplish a return to normal. The binary the international community now faces is “deal or force”.

Dive deeper
Iran likely sees two paths to controlling the strait. First, Iranian control could be officially recognised by the United States through an agreement. Other countries would probably oppose such recognition, but changing the new status quo would be extremely challenging. Second, Iran could maintain the current situation by firing missiles or drones at ships that fail to heed Iranian demands. Very few countries — and perhaps none — will approve of Iranian threats, but stopping Iranian coercion will require the use of force or an agreement that formally ends Iranian efforts to assert sovereignty over the strait. If negotiations do not lead rapidly to an agreement to reopen the strait under the previous, internationally recognised transit scheme, it will be necessary to resort to force.

UK UK Domestic Politics

UK Pump-Price Relief in Prospect as Brent Falls Below $100 on Bank Holiday

If Brent crude’s 5.8% Monday drop below $100 holds, UK pump prices are likely to fall materially in the coming weeks. Petrol and diesel prices typically lag Brent moves by 10-14 days through wholesale and retail margins; a sustained Brent at $97 would translate into pump prices roughly 8-12 pence per litre lower than the post-war peak. Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s cost-of-living package — including the cancellation of a planned 5p rise in fuel duty — would compound the relief if the oil-price move proves durable. UK markets were closed today for the Spring Bank Holiday; the FTSE 100 reopens Tuesday with the question of how much oil-price relief is already in the price.

Dive deeper
Brent at $84-90 would be the price level consistent with a confirmed, signed Iran-US deal that reopens the Strait of Hormuz at scale; the current $97 level reflects partial optimism with substantial residual risk. The fiscal-policy implication for Reeves is that lower oil prices reduce headline inflation, restore Bank of England headroom for further rate cuts, and ease the household-income squeeze that has been the central political-economy variable through the war. The combination of a Brent-driven inflation easing, an unemployment uptick that points to cooler-than-expected wage growth, and the Treasury cost-of-living package is the substantive policy spine of the Starmer-Reeves “hard decisions bearing fruit” argument.

Jones’s “Fantasy Politics” Warning Holds Through Bank Holiday Weekend

Senior Starmer ally Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, warned Labour against playing “fantasy politics” on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg yesterday: there is no “magic answer” to the country’s problems and “Britain is poorer and weaker than it needs to be”. Jones said Andy Burnham is “a brilliant politician” and he would campaign for him in Makerfield. The framing held through the Monday bank-holiday news cycle as the dominant cabinet-side line on the leadership question. Jones added: “Irrespective of individual ambitions from any of my colleagues, the big questions the country faces are still the big questions the country faces.”

Dive deeper
Jones acknowledged the necessity of an internal party debate following Labour’s electoral setbacks: “I’m all up for having a debate inside the Labour Party about how we improve our electoral performance in the years ahead, because we don’t want to hand the country to Reform.” Sir Keir Starmer has defended his leadership, asserting that “our plan is working” and vowing to “keep pushing forward”. The Prime Minister has insisted he will not step down from No 10 even if Burnham wins the 18 June by-election and triggers a leadership contest. More than 150 Labour MPs have indicated support for the Prime Minister, or said it was not the right time for a leadership contest.

Alan Johnson — Burnham “Would Have To Call Snap General Election”

Former Home Secretary Alan Johnson said yesterday that Labour MPs would be “daft” if they backed a leadership bid by Andy Burnham. Johnson told Radio 4’s Broadcasting House: “Absolutely no case for Keir Starmer to step down.” Asked whether Burnham should be Prime Minister, Johnson said: “Absolutely not.” Johnson suggested Burnham would have to call a snap general election if he became Prime Minister — a mandate-renewal mechanism that would be the operational test of whether a Burnham premiership could survive its own elevation. The framing has been picked up across the Monday papers and continues to anchor the cabinet-side defensive argument against a leadership transition.

Dive deeper
Johnson’s “snap general election” framing is the constitutional-political case against a Burnham succession. The historical precedent is patchy: Gordon Brown in 2007 chose not to call an election, with consequences that ended Labour’s 1997-2010 cycle. The argument cuts against the practical politics of the Burnham campaign: triggering a snap general election whilst polling behind Reform UK would risk handing power to Nigel Farage. The political-mathematical question is whether the snap-election logic constrains Burnham’s leadership ambitions, or merely shapes the post-leadership-contest framing. Burnham’s campaign in Makerfield continues to focus on the local-constituency framing rather than the national-leadership one.

Streeting’s Substantive Policy Spine — Wealth Tax + Sure Start + Planning Reforms

Wes Streeting has set out a policy platform combining a wealth tax to fund a return of the New Labour-era Sure Start programme, and planning reforms to fund council homes to prevent children growing up in temporary accommodation. The Streeting platform now competes substantively with Burnham’s constitutional-reform-plus-NHS positioning for the same Tribune-Group-adjacent soft-left base. Streeting told reporters on Friday he had “the numbers including ministers” to launch a leadership bid against Sir Keir Starmer but held off “to give Andy Burnham the chance” to fight the Makerfield by-election.

Dive deeper
Streeting also suggested making the independent Planning Inspectorate more involved in approving new housing and easing some of the thresholds at which housing developers must carry out an environmental assessment of their proposals. The combination of wealth tax + restored Sure Start + planning-driven council homes is the social-democratic spine of the Streeting offer. It is to the left of the 2024 Starmer-Reeves prospectus on tax but to the right on planning. Burnham, by contrast, has paired Streeting’s wealth-tax openness with proportional representation in the next manifesto, council tax reform, rail renationalisation, more council houses, and the inheritance-tax-to-care-levy switch. The two candidates are now publicly cross-endorsing each other for the by-election while drawing different policy lines.

Reeves Cost-of-Living Package Starts to Bite as Brent Drops

Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s cost-of-living package this week — the cancellation of a planned 5p rise in fuel duty, free bus travel for children over the summer holiday, a VAT reduction from 20% to 5% on tickets for summer attractions (theme parks, zoos and museums), the removal of import tariffs from 100 food items including biscuits and baked beans, a VAT cut on children’s meals, and a £120 million support package for the ceramics industry — provides the Treasury-side answer to the political-economy challenge that has dogged Labour since the Iran war began on 28 February. Friends of Reeves believe there is a world in which she survives the transition to a Burnham premiership precisely because it would reassure the markets.

Dive deeper
The Stoke component of the package is politically specific: Stoke was won by Boris Johnson’s Tories in 2019, taken back by Labour in 2024, and is now a Reform UK target. Inflation has slowed to 2.8% — the lowest level in over a year — and the economy has been growing above expectations. The Bank of England’s lower-interest-rate stance is likely to remain in place with unemployment beginning to rise. Reeves’s allies have been lobbying Labour MPs in defence of her job, warning the “biggest fear for the bond markets and the unions is Ed Miliband” if Burnham becomes Prime Minister. The chancellor question is now “almost as important as that for prime minister”.
One To Read

How Iran Hopes to Control the Strait of Hormuz: It’s Not Just About Fees

Institute for the Study of War · The analytical anchor for tonight’s Baghaei “fees not presented as tolls” reframing. Iran’s sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz is more important to Tehran than fee revenue. The protraction of the current situation serves Iran’s interests by normalising de facto control, which is why Iran is stalling. The strait will not return to normal without either a deal that ends Iranian control or a US-led military operation that forces it open. Recognition of Iranian sovereignty is unacceptable and fails to accomplish a return to normal. The binary the international community now faces is “deal or force”.
☼

Morning Briefing

Monday 25 May 2026 — 08:15 BST

What It Means For You

  • President Donald Trump tempered Saturday’s “largely negotiated” framing on Sunday, posting on Truth Social that he had told US representatives “not to rush into a deal” with Iran. “Time is on our side. The Blockade will remain in full force and effect until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed.” A senior Trump administration official told reporters yesterday an agreement would not be signed Sunday, that Iran had agreed “in principle” to open the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the US lifting its naval blockade, and to dispose of Tehran’s highly enriched uranium — though there was no immediate Iranian confirmation of what “in principle” means.
  • The proposed framework now sequences first: reopen the Strait of Hormuz and lift the US naval blockade. Sanctions relief and the release of Iran’s frozen funds happen only after the strait reopens and is fully functioning, US officials said. A 60-day window follows for nuclear-programme negotiations, including Iran’s pledged commitment to never pursue a nuclear weapon and to enter negotiations on giving up its highly enriched uranium stockpile while pausing new enrichment. Brent settled at $102.30 at Friday’s close; London opens this morning with the “reached, certified, and signed” framing as the dominant variable for European energy and gilt pricing.
  • Senior Starmer ally Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, warned Labour against “fantasy politics” on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg yesterday: there is no “magic answer” to the country’s problems and “Britain is poorer and weaker than it needs to be”. Former Home Secretary Alan Johnson said Labour MPs would be “daft” to back an Andy Burnham leadership bid and that Burnham would have to call a snap general election if he became Prime Minister; Johnson said there is “absolutely no case for Keir Starmer to step down”. The Makerfield by-election is 18 June.

GEO Geopolitical

Trump — “No Rush”, “Time On Our Side”; Blockade Stays Until Signed

President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday: “I have informed my representatives not to rush into a deal in that time is on our side.” He added: “The Blockade will remain in full force and effect until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed… Both sides must take their time and get it right. There can be no mistakes!” The post tempered Saturday’s “largely negotiated” framing by 24 hours and put the US naval blockade of Iranian ports back at the centre of the leverage calculation. Trump separately said: “If I make a deal with Iran, it will be a good and proper one… So don’t listen to the losers, who are critical about something they know nothing about.”

Dive deeper
Trump also said yesterday a possible Iran deal “isn’t even fully negotiated yet”, and that any agreement would not give Iran “a clear and open path to a Nuclear Weapon”. He added that negotiations were “proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner” and the US relationship with Iran was becoming “much more professional and productive”. The Sunday pullback is the second major shift in 24 hours: Saturday night’s social-media announcement raised global hopes; Sunday afternoon’s “don’t rush” framing reasserted US leverage. Brent crude held at $102.30 into the Friday close; markets re-open Monday with the question of whether the framework signs this week as the dominant variable for energy and rates pricing.

Senior US Official — Iran Agreed “In Principle”; Hormuz First, Uranium Later

A senior Trump administration official told reporters on Sunday an agreement with Iran would not be signed yesterday because the Iranian system “did not move fast enough”. The official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said Iran had agreed “in principle” to open the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the United States lifting its naval blockade, and to dispose of Tehran’s highly enriched uranium. There was no immediate Iranian confirmation or elaboration on what “in principle” meant. Washington envisions first re-opening the strait and lifting the US naval blockade; negotiating the details of the nuclear measures would take more time.

Dive deeper
A second senior administration official said yesterday the proposed framework would give negotiators 60 days to reach a final deal. The sequencing the official described aligns with the framework that Reuters sources had outlined: end-of-war declaration first, then Hormuz, then a 30-to-60-day window for the broader settlement. Iran would commit never to pursue a nuclear weapon and to enter negotiations on giving up its highly enriched uranium stockpile while pausing new enrichment, according to a person familiar with the matter. The US official described the approach as “relief for performance”: allowing Iran to trade oil would also free up the global oil market by unblocking the strait.

Sanctions Relief, Frozen-Funds Release Only After Hormuz Fully Functions

The unfreezing of Iranian assets will occur only once the Strait of Hormuz has reopened, a senior US administration official said yesterday. Sanctions imposed on Iran will only be lifted once the strait is open and fully functioning again. The conditional sequencing — Hormuz first, then everything else — is the operational architecture of the proposed memorandum of understanding. Iran has committed not to pursue a nuclear weapon and would enter negotiations on giving up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium and pausing any new enrichment. Multiple Iranian outlets reported on Sunday that the strait would remain under Iranian supervision over a 30-day period, with shipping returning to pre-war levels.

Dive deeper
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Sunday the deal was a “work in progress”. The Iranian counter-briefing on the strait remains the largest open variable: Tehran briefs that Iran continues to supervise the waterway under a 30-day framework; Washington briefs that the strait will be fully reopened and demined. The CNN-reported architecture builds in a US incentive structure (sanctions relief contingent on actual Hormuz functioning, not just declarations) that gives Washington enforcement leverage through the 60-day window. Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Esmail Baghaei described the latest proposal as a “framework agreement” that would first establish broad principles before details are negotiated over 30 to 60 days.

Five Unresolved Issues; Iran Rejects Efforts to Defer Core Demands

IRGC-affiliated reporting has identified frozen assets, sanctions relief, the US naval blockade, Lebanon, and the Strait of Hormuz as the main unresolved issues — every issue in the first stage of the proposed agreement, before talks on the nuclear programme begin. Mediators appear to be trying to preserve momentum by sequencing the unresolved issues and developing technical arrangements for the strait, but Iranian reporting indicates Iran has rejected efforts to defer its core demands. The IRGC-affiliated Tasnim news agency said differences remain over “one or two clauses” and a source said there would be no final understanding if the US continued to “create obstacles”.

Dive deeper
The Tasnim formulation — one or two clauses pending, with an Iran walk-away threat if the US creates obstacles — is the standard Iranian negotiating-posture template. The five unresolved first-stage issues (frozen assets, sanctions relief, US blockade, Lebanon, Hormuz) are precisely the questions Washington has tried to push into the 60-day nuclear-talks window; Iran wants them resolved up-front. The two Pakistani sources involved in the negotiations have described the deal under discussion as “fairly comprehensive to terminate the war”. If the US accepts the memorandum, further talks could take place after the Eid holiday ends on Friday. The Tehran/Washington gap is now sequencing, not principle: both sides agree on the components, but Iran wants front-loaded resolution and the US wants conditional sequencing.

Iran “Stalling” to Normalise Hormuz Control; “Deal or Force” the Binary

Iran is likely stalling and delaying the negotiations process precisely because the protraction of the current situation serves Iran’s interests by normalising its de facto control of transit through the Strait of Hormuz. One of Iran’s primary negotiating objectives is to secure sovereignty over the strait — an objective more important to Tehran than fee revenue from merchant vessels. The strait will not return to normal without either a deal that ends Iranian control or a US-led military operation that forces the strait open. Recognition of Iranian claims of sovereignty is both unacceptable and fails to accomplish a return to normal. The binary the international community now faces is “deal or force”.

Dive deeper
Iran likely sees two paths to controlling the strait. First, Iranian control could be officially recognised by the United States through an agreement. Other countries would probably oppose such recognition, but changing the new status quo would be extremely challenging. Second, Iran could maintain the current situation by firing missiles or drones (or credibly threatening to do so) at ships that fail to heed Iranian demands related to transiting the strait. Very few countries — and perhaps none — will approve of Iranian threats, but stopping Iranian coercion will require the use of force or an agreement that formally ends Iranian efforts to assert sovereignty over the strait. If negotiations do not lead rapidly to an agreement to reopen the strait under the previous, internationally recognised transit scheme, it will be necessary to resort to force.

UK UK Domestic Politics

Jones — Warns Labour Against “Fantasy Politics”; “No Magic Answer”

Senior Starmer ally Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, warned Labour against playing “fantasy politics” on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg yesterday. With Andy Burnham and Wes Streeting both positioning themselves to replace the Prime Minister, Jones said there is no “magic answer” to fix the country’s problems. “Irrespective of individual ambitions from any of my colleagues, the big questions the country faces are still the big questions the country faces,” he said. “Britain is poorer and weaker than it needs to be.” Jones said Burnham is “a brilliant politician” and he would campaign for him in Makerfield.

Dive deeper
Jones’s framing is the most explicit cabinet-level intervention on the leadership question since the cabinet ring-fence around the Prime Minister began to hold operationally last week. The argument is structural: that the underlying political-economy challenges — poorer-than-required Britain, weaker-than-required Britain — will face any successor exactly as they face Starmer, so a leadership change is a process distraction rather than a solution. The framing is also designed for Labour members ahead of any contest: ambition is acceptable but should not displace policy seriousness. Jones — one of the Prime Minister’s closest cabinet allies and a regular Treasury-side communicator — is the bridge between the fiscal discipline of the Reeves agenda and the broader Starmer political-survival argument.

Alan Johnson — Labour MPs “Daft” to Back Burnham; Snap-Election Warning

Former Home Secretary Alan Johnson said yesterday that Labour MPs would be “daft” if they backed a leadership bid by Andy Burnham. Johnson said: “Absolutely no case for Keir Starmer to step down.” Asked whether Burnham should be Prime Minister, Johnson said: “Absolutely not.” Johnson suggested Burnham would have to call a snap general election if he became Prime Minister — a mandate-renewal mechanism that would be the operational test of whether a Burnham premiership could survive its own elevation. The Prime Minister has insisted he will not walk away from No 10 if Burnham wins the 18 June by-election and triggers a leadership contest.

Dive deeper
Johnson’s “snap general election” framing is the constitutional-political case against a Burnham succession: that a leadership change to Burnham without going to the country would be perceived as an unmandated transition and would compound rather than resolve the legitimacy questions facing the government. The historical precedent that supports the argument is patchy — Gordon Brown in 2007 chose not to call an election, with consequences that ended Labour’s 1997-2010 cycle. The argument cuts against the practical politics of the Burnham campaign: triggering a snap general election whilst polling behind Reform UK would risk handing power to Nigel Farage. The political-mathematical question is whether the snap-election logic constrains Burnham’s leadership ambitions or merely shapes the post-leadership-contest framing.

Streeting Platform — Wealth Tax + Sure Start + Planning Reforms for Council Homes

Wes Streeting has set out a policy platform including a wealth tax to fund a return of the New Labour-era Sure Start programme, and planning reforms to fund council homes to prevent children growing up in temporary accommodation. Streeting told reporters on Friday he had “the numbers including ministers” to launch a leadership bid against Sir Keir Starmer but held off “to give Andy Burnham the chance” to fight the Makerfield by-election. The Streeting platform now has substantive social-policy content (Sure Start, council homes, wealth tax) that competes with Burnham’s constitutional-reform-plus-NHS positioning.

Dive deeper
Streeting also suggested in interviews making the independent Planning Inspectorate more involved in approving new housing and easing some of the thresholds at which housing developers must carry out an environmental assessment of their proposals. The combination of wealth tax + restored Sure Start + planning-driven council homes is the social-democratic spine of the Streeting offer. It is to the left of the 2024 Starmer-Reeves prospectus on tax (wealth tax) but to the right on planning (loosening environmental thresholds for housing supply). Streeting’s positioning is now squarely competitive with Burnham for the same Tribune-Group-adjacent soft-left base, even though the two have publicly endorsed each other for the by-election.

Al Carns — Selly Oak Armed Forces Minister Emerges as Dark Horse

Al Carns, the Labour MP for Birmingham Selly Oak and minister for the armed forces, is being talked up in some Labour circles as a dark horse leadership contender. Carns was first elected in 2024 with a majority of 11,537 and was swiftly promoted to veterans minister, then minister for the armed forces in last September’s reshuffle. Carns published an article in the New Statesman titled “How Labour can win again”, in which he wrote “too many people in this country work hard and still struggle”. He would need the support of 81 Parliamentary colleagues to get on the ballot paper of any leadership contest if one is triggered.

Dive deeper
A friend of Carns described him as “a born leader” but said he “won’t fire the starting gun” on a contest — expecting him to come in behind a better-supported candidate if needed. The Carns story is the post-Burnham/post-Streeting third-way leadership scenario: an armed-forces-minister-with-military-CV who could plausibly counter Reform UK’s national-security framing on the doorstep without alienating the soft-left base. The 81-MP threshold is the structural gatekeeper: any third candidate — whether Carns, Ed Miliband, Shabana Mahmood, Yvette Cooper or another — needs to secure that many declared backers to appear on the ballot. Both Burnham and Streeting’s teams have claimed in recent days to have the 81 numbers; both have been unable to demonstrate them publicly.
One To Read

Iran Update Special Report, May 24, 2026 — Sequencing the Five Unresolved Issues

Institute for the Study of War · The single most important analytical paper for understanding the Sunday-pullback to Monday-morning shift. The proposed framework now sequences five first-stage issues (frozen assets, sanctions relief, US naval blockade, Lebanon, Strait of Hormuz) ahead of the 60-day nuclear-talks window. Mediators are trying to preserve momentum by sequencing technical arrangements; Iran is rejecting efforts to defer its core demands. Trump’s “reached, certified, and signed” framing puts the US naval blockade back at the centre of the leverage calculation. The Tehran/Washington gap is now sequencing, not principle.
☽

Evening Briefing

Sunday 24 May 2026 — 18:30 BST

What It Means For You

  • Details of the emerging US-Iran deal firmed up through the day. Two regional officials briefed on the negotiations said today the agreement includes a 60-day ceasefire extension during which the Strait of Hormuz reopens with no tolls and Iran clears the mines it laid; Iran would freely sell oil through sanctions waivers; and the US would lift its naval blockade of Iranian ports. Iran would commit never to pursue nuclear weapons and to negotiate the suspension of uranium enrichment and the removal of its highly enriched uranium stockpile during the 60-day window. But a senior Iranian source today denied Tehran had agreed to hand over its uranium — the central US demand — and an Iranian military spokesman said Iran will continue to control the Strait of Hormuz “even in the event of an agreement with the United States”.
  • Secretary of State Marco Rubio said today “significant progress, although not final progress, has been made” in the talks. Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said: “We remain ready for talks, but the experience of past negotiations with the US forces us to exercise the utmost caution.” Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi posted on social media: Iran is “seeking peace with strength, pursuing diplomacy with dignity and firmly defending the territorial integrity, independence and rights of our beloved Iran”. The Sunday political shows in the UK led with the Labour leadership question, with the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg airing at 09:00.
  • If a final agreement is reached, US forces that moved to the area in recent months to support the assault on Iran would withdraw. President Trump told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday that he will not sign any final agreement without conditions that Iran dismantle its entire nuclear programme and remove all enriched uranium from the country. Brent eased to $102.30 at Friday’s close, ten-year gilts at 5.02%; markets re-open Monday with the “largely negotiated” framework as the dominant variable for European and Asian energy pricing.

GEO Geopolitical

US-Iran Deal Details — 60-Day Hormuz Reopening, Sanctions Waivers, Uranium Dispute

Two regional officials briefed on the Pakistan-led negotiations said today the United States is close to a deal with Iran that would end the war, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and see Iran give up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Under the emerging agreement, the Strait of Hormuz would gradually reopen in parallel with the US ending its blockade of Iran’s ports. The US would allow Iran to sell oil through sanctions waivers, with sanctions relief and the release of Iran’s frozen funds negotiated during a 60-day time frame. The draft deal also includes an end to the war between Israel and Hezbollah and a commitment to non-interference in the domestic affairs of countries in the region.

Dive deeper
The draft memorandum of understanding currently provides for a 60-day extension of the ceasefire. During that period, the Strait of Hormuz would be open to shipping without fees and Iran would commit to clearing mines laid there. The draft also includes Iranian pledges never to seek nuclear weapons and to negotiate the suspension of its uranium enrichment programme and the removal of its highly enriched uranium stockpile. US forces that moved to the area in recent months to participate in the assault on Iran would only withdraw if a final agreement is reached. The US official described Trump’s approach as “relief for performance”: allowing Iran to trade oil would also free up the global oil market by unblocking the Strait of Hormuz. President Trump told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday that he will not sign any final agreement without the conditions that Iran dismantle its entire nuclear programme and give up all its enriched uranium.

Iran Denies Uranium Handover; Military — “Iran Will Continue to Control” Strait

A senior Iranian source said today that Tehran has not agreed to hand over its uranium stockpile to the United States. An Iranian military spokesman stressed on X that Iran would continue to control the Strait of Hormuz even in the event of an agreement with the United States. IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News Agency reported the potential agreement allocates 30 days for procedures related to the Strait of Hormuz and a 60-day period for nuclear talks, and that Iran has not yet accepted any actions on its nuclear programme. The Iranian counter-briefing today directly disputes the President Trump “largely negotiated” framing of Saturday night.

Dive deeper
Iranian Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said yesterday the strait “does not concern” the United States and that Iran and Oman should define a mechanism for the waterway as coastal states — a position illegal under international maritime law. IRGC-affiliated Fars News separately said Iran will only commit to restoring the number of vessels that transit the strait to pre-war levels, while Iran would determine which vessels receive approval and what route they must take. The Iran-side public messaging is the single biggest open variable for the “largely negotiated” framework: Trump claims the strait reopens; Iran briefs that the strait remains Iran-managed. The IRGC Navy reported yesterday that 25 vessels crossed the strait in the past 24 hours after receiving permission and transiting under IRGC Navy coordination.

Rubio — “Significant Progress, Not Final”; Pezeshkian Urges “Utmost Caution”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio struck a cooler tone today than the President had on Saturday night, saying: “Significant progress, although not final progress, has been made.” Rubio repeated the US position that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon and must turn over its highly enriched uranium, and the Strait of Hormuz must be opened. Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian, whose office released a statement today, said: “We remain ready for talks, but the experience of past negotiations with the US forces us to exercise the utmost caution.” Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi posted on social media early Sunday that Iran is “seeking peace with strength, pursuing diplomacy with dignity and firmly defending the territorial integrity, independence and rights of our beloved Iran”.

Dive deeper
The Rubio/Pezeshkian/Gharibabadi triangulation is the diagnostic for where the deal really stands: Rubio confirms progress but applies friction on the uranium and Hormuz conditions; Pezeshkian signals openness but warns of mistrust; Gharibabadi’s “dignity” framing pre-positions Iran to walk away if conditions are tightened. The Trump-Netanyahu call yesterday reinforced the US red line that no final agreement is possible without complete dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear programme and removal of all enriched uranium from Iran. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi today spoke with European and regional counterparts and the United Nations Secretary General António Guterres, seeking to defuse tensions.

Pakistan’s Sharif and Munir Push Iran Toward Deal in Tehran Visit

Iran today hosted Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chief of Defence Forces Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, who met with Iran’s political and military leadership and pushed for Tehran to agree to the proposed agreement. The Sharif-Munir Sunday visit follows Munir’s “short but highly productive” visit on Saturday and is the most senior Pakistani diplomatic deployment since the negotiating process began. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also spoke with European and regional counterparts and the United Nations Secretary General António Guterres today, seeking to defuse tensions.

Dive deeper
Three senior Iranian officials said today that Iran had agreed to a memorandum of understanding that would stop the fighting and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The three officials said a few hours before Trump’s Truth Social announcement that Iran had sent a draft of the agreement to the White House for the President’s approval. It is not clear whether the proposal the Iranian officials said they had agreed upon is the same draft Trump referred to in his social media post. The discrepancy between US-side optimism and Iranian-side caveats — particularly on Hormuz control and uranium handover — is the binding test for whether the framework crystallises into a signed agreement.

Iran “Stalling” to Normalise Hormuz Control; “Deal or Force” the Binary Choice

One of Iran’s primary negotiating objectives is to secure sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz — an objective more important to Tehran than fee revenue from merchant vessels. Iran is likely stalling and delaying the negotiations process precisely because the protraction of the current situation serves Iran’s interests by letting Tehran normalise its de facto control of transit through the strait. The international community cannot “wait out” Iran’s control. The strait will not return to normal without either a deal that ends Iranian control or a US-led military operation that forces the strait open. Recognition of Iranian claims of sovereignty is both unacceptable and fails to accomplish a return to normal.

Dive deeper
Iran likely sees two paths to controlling the strait. First, Iranian control could be officially recognised by the United States through an agreement. Other countries would probably oppose such recognition, but changing the new status quo would be extremely challenging. Second, Iran could maintain the current situation by firing missiles or drones (or credibly threatening to do so) at ships that fail to heed Iranian demands related to transiting the strait. Very few countries — and perhaps none — will approve of Iranian threats, but stopping Iranian coercion will require the use of force or an agreement that formally ends Iranian efforts to assert sovereignty over the strait. If negotiations do not lead rapidly to an agreement to reopen the strait under the previous, internationally recognised transit scheme, it will unfortunately be necessary to resort to force.

UK UK Domestic Politics

Sunday Political Shows — Leadership Question Dominates; Kuenssberg Airs 09:00

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg aired at 09:00 on BBC One, with the Labour leadership question the dominant frame across all the morning political shows today. The previous week’s edition was explicitly titled “Can Starmer Survive?”. The 18 June Makerfield by-election is the operational test of whether Andy Burnham can convert his personal popularity into an MP seat and from there a leadership challenge; a Burnham loss would, on his own allies’ admission, end his ambitions.

Dive deeper
Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon — a local plumber and army reservist who came within 5,399 votes of Josh Simons in 2024 — is the operational test of whether Labour’s migration tightening and Burnham’s personal pull are enough to check Reform’s advance into traditional Labour territory. Reform comfortably won every ward in the Makerfield constituency at the 7 May local elections. Burnham himself won 66% of the vote in Wigan in the 2024 Greater Manchester mayoral election. The Sunday political shows next week (31 May) will fall within two weeks of the by-election and will be where the campaign tempo accelerates.

Burnham — “Great Resentment” About IHT; Care Levy to “Save NHS”

Andy Burnham used Friday’s Makerfield campaign launch to put the NHS firmly on the agenda. Burnham said: “There is a great resentment about inheritance tax — take that away and look at a care levy.” The Greater Manchester mayor said he thought the NHS was “almost being overwhelmed” by a “broken” care system. The IHT-to-social-care-levy idea picks up a long-running social-policy thread: think tanks across the political spectrum have argued for hypothecating funds for adult social care, but no major UK party has previously made an explicit pledge. Burnham is the first senior Labour figure with realistic leadership prospects to put it formally on the table.

Dive deeper
Burnham’s “there is a great resentment” framing is calibrated for the doorstep: it acknowledges voters’ lived experience of IHT thresholds and combines it with a substantive policy answer (the care levy) rather than a defensive position. The platform now has: proportional representation in the next manifesto, council tax reform, rail renationalisation, more council houses, wealth-tax openness (following Streeting), and the IHT-to-care-levy switch. The aggregate is materially to the left of the 2024 Starmer-Reeves prospectus while still committing to honour the existing manifesto. Sir Keir Starmer said on Thursday he would campaign personally for Burnham in Makerfield; the political theatre of a Prime Minister campaigning for a leadership-rival-in-waiting is now the central drama of the next four weeks.

“Operation Save Starmer” — Economy + Inflation Tailwinds; Bank Rates on Downward Path

Inside Downing Street, Starmer’s allies now believe they can “Keep Keir In”. New figures show the economy growing above expectations, inflation has slowed to 2.8% — the lowest level in over a year — and Rachel Reeves’s preferred environment of lower interest rates to protect mortgage holders is likely to remain the Bank of England’s stance with unemployment beginning to rise. Reeves’s cost-of-living package this week — free bus travel for children, the cancellation of a planned 5p rise in fuel duty, a VAT cut from 20% to 5% on summer attraction tickets, 100 food-tariff removals, and a £120m support package for the ceramics industry — is the substantive policy spine of the Prime Minister’s argument that the hard decisions are bearing fruit.

Dive deeper
On Starmer’s reckoning, Burnham is far from “nailed on” in Makerfield, and Wes Streeting will have a struggle to get back into the leadership race on favourable terms having resigned from cabinet only to fail to secure “the numbers”. Friends of Reeves believe there is a world in which she survives the transition to a Burnham premiership precisely because it would reassure the markets. Reeves’s allies have been lobbying Labour MPs in defence of her job, warning that the “biggest fear for the bond markets and the unions is Ed Miliband”. The chancellor question is now “almost as important as that for prime minister”.

BBC Radio Manchester — Makerfield Candidates Series Underway

BBC Radio Manchester is running a series of interviews this week with candidates for the 18 June Makerfield by-election. Andy Burnham took questions from presenter Mike Sweeney and audience members on Wednesday; Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon and Liberal Democrat Stockport councillor Jake Austin appear in the same series later in the week. The format — candidates fielding live audience questions — is the most direct constituency-level testing of campaign positioning to date. The writ for the by-election was moved by the Commons speaker after Josh Simons’s resignation; polling day is 21-27 days from the writ.

Dive deeper
The Makerfield constituency lies to the west of Manchester and is home to about 76,000 voters in the suburbs of Wigan and nearby former mining towns and villages. The local-election context: Reform UK won 24 of 25 council seats in Wigan borough on 7 May; the borough contains the Makerfield constituency. Burnham himself won 66% of the vote in the 2024 Greater Manchester mayoral election in Wigan. Reform leader Nigel Farage has framed the contest as a “David versus Goliath battle” with the “Plucky Plumber” Kenyon taking on Burnham. The Lib Dem Austin pitch is “Makerfield deserves so much more than the failing Labour Government or the divisive politics of Reform UK”.
One To Read

How Iran Hopes to Control the Strait of Hormuz: It’s Not Just About Fees

Institute for the Study of War · The single most important analytical paper for understanding tonight’s “largely negotiated” framing dispute. Iran’s sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz is more important to Tehran than fee revenue. The protraction of the current situation serves Iran’s interests by normalising de facto control, which is why Iran is stalling negotiations. The strait will not return to normal without either a deal that ends Iranian control or a US-led military operation that forces it open. Recognition of Iranian sovereignty is unacceptable and fails to accomplish a return to normal. The binary the international community now faces is “deal or force”.
☼

Morning Briefing

Sunday 24 May 2026 — 08:15 BST

What It Means For You

  • President Donald Trump said overnight that a memorandum of understanding on a peace deal with Iran — including the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz — has been “largely negotiated”. Iran disputes the strait claim. Iran’s Fars news agency said early Sunday that the agreement would allow Iran to manage the Strait of Hormuz, calling Trump’s reopening assertion “inconsistent with reality”. Iran and Pakistan submitted a revised proposal to Washington on Saturday; a formal US response is expected today. Two Pakistani sources described the deal being negotiated as “fairly comprehensive to terminate the war”.
  • Andy Burnham used his Makerfield campaign launch on Friday to say he would look at Wes Streeting’s proposal for a wealth tax and suggested inheritance tax could be abolished and replaced with a social care levy paid to fund improvement in the sector. Burnham’s allies suggest Ed Miliband as his pick for chancellor. Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s allies are lobbying Labour MPs in defence of her job — warning Miliband “would not be trusted by the bond markets”. The leadership-and-chancellor question now defines the next four weeks of UK politics ahead of the 18 June Makerfield vote.
  • The proposed Iran framework would unfold in three stages: formally ending the war, resolving the Hormuz crisis and launching a 30-day window for negotiations on a broader agreement. Two-month negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme would follow. The Strait of Hormuz would be reopened and the US would end its blockade of Iranian ports. Brent eased to $102.30 at Friday’s close, ten-year gilts at 5.02%; the operational variable for Monday’s European open is whether Washington accepts the proposal today.

GEO Geopolitical

Trump — Iran Deal “Largely Negotiated”; Hormuz Reopening Claimed

President Donald Trump said on Saturday night that a memorandum of understanding on a peace deal with Iran has been “largely negotiated”, with details to be unveiled soon. “Final aspects and details of the Deal are currently being discussed, and will be announced shortly,” Trump said on his Truth Social platform. Trump posted that the emerging agreement would reopen the Strait of Hormuz. He said he had spoken with leaders from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan and Bahrain, and separately with Israel. The Gulf and regional leaders encouraged Trump to agree to the emerging framework.

Dive deeper
Trump said earlier on Saturday he was holding off on a military strike against Iran because “serious negotiations” were underway, and at the request of allies in the Middle East. The Trump “largely negotiated” framing is the most explicit US-side optimism of the post-ceasefire period. A regional official with direct knowledge of the Pakistan-led mediation efforts described the deal contents: an official declaration of the war’s end, a two-month window for negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and the end of the US blockade of Iranian ports. The framework would unfold in three stages: ending the war, resolving the Hormuz crisis, and launching a 30-day broader-agreement window that can be extended.

Iran’s Fars — Trump’s Hormuz Reopening Claim “Inconsistent With Reality”

Iran’s Fars news agency, which is close to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, reported early on Sunday that the emerging agreement would allow Iran to manage the Strait of Hormuz, and that Trump’s assertion the strait would be reopened was “inconsistent with reality”. Iranian Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said on Saturday that the strait “does not concern” the United States and that Iran and Oman should define a mechanism for the waterway as coastal states. Tasnim News Agency, also IRGC-affiliated, reported that Iran has demanded the strait not return to its pre-war mechanism and “legal regime”, and that negotiations will not proceed while the US naval blockade remains in place.

Dive deeper
The Iranian state-media pushback frames the most consequential split in the emerging deal: Trump claims the strait will be reopened; Iran is briefing that the strait will continue to be Iran-managed. Iranian officials have repeatedly stated that Iranian sovereignty over the strait is more important to Tehran than securing fees from merchant vessels. IRGC-affiliated Fars News separately said Iran will only commit to restoring the number of vessels that transit the strait to pre-war levels, while Iran would determine which vessels receive approval and what route they must take. The IRGC Navy reported on 23 May that 25 vessels crossed the strait in the past 24 hours after receiving permission and transiting under IRGC Navy coordination and security provision.

Iran and Pakistan Submit Revised Proposal; US Response Expected Today

Iran and Pakistan submitted a revised proposal to the United States late on Saturday to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, two Pakistani sources familiar with the negotiations said. A US response is expected today. “The deal is fairly comprehensive,” a Pakistani official involved in the negotiations said. “It is never over till it is done.” Pakistan’s Chief of Defence Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir left Tehran on Saturday after talks with Iran’s top negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. The Pakistan military statement on Saturday described the visit as “short but highly productive” with “encouraging progress” towards a final understanding.

Dive deeper
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said on Saturday: “The trend this week has been towards a reduction in disputes, but there are still issues that need to be discussed through mediators. We will have to wait and see where the situation ends in the next three or four days.” Baghaei separately said Tehran’s approach has been to draft a 14-point memorandum of understanding “that includes the most important issues necessary for ending the war and matters that are fundamental for us”. Foreign Minister Araghchi held a series of diplomatic calls on Saturday with counterparts in Turkey, Iraq, Qatar and Oman. Trump is expected to discuss the latest Iran draft with advisers and may decide today whether to resume attacks on Iran if the draft is rejected.

Three-Stage Framework — End War, Resolve Hormuz, 30-Day Window

The proposed framework would unfold in three stages: formally ending the war, resolving the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz and launching a 30-day window for negotiations on a broader agreement, which can be extended. A two-month negotiation track on Iran’s nuclear programme would follow the war-ending declaration. Iran has demanded an end to the US blockade of Iranian ports, the lifting of sanctions on Iranian oil sales, the release of frozen funds and supervision of the strait. If the US and Iran agree, the memorandum would lead to further talks after the Eid holiday ends on Friday.

Dive deeper
There is no guarantee Washington will accept the revised proposal. Iranian officials have indicated willingness to transfer the highly enriched uranium stockpile to a neutral third country, but firmly reject handing it directly to the United States. Trump’s Truth Social framing — “Final aspects and details of the Deal are currently being discussed” — sits against the parallel briefing from Iranian state media that the strait will remain under Iranian management. The fundamental US-Iran disagreement on Hormuz governance is the binding test of whether the three-stage framework crystallises into a signed agreement or collapses back into the “fundamentally incompatible negotiating positions” pattern of recent weeks.

Iran’s Counterproposal Frontloads Demands; “Regime Believes It Is Winning”

Iran’s latest counterproposal frontloads its key demands on the withdrawal of “a US threat to Iran”, financial relief, and Iran’s “right” to manage the Strait of Hormuz, while attempting to delay discussion of Iran’s nuclear programme. The proposal indicates the Iranian regime believes it is winning the war and is negotiating from a position of strength. Iranian officials continue to emphasise Iranian management of the Strait of Hormuz as the key sticking point. Iran has demanded an end to the US naval blockade and said negotiations will not proceed while the blockade remains in place.

Dive deeper
One of Iran’s primary objectives in the current negotiations is to secure its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz — an objective more important to Tehran than the fee revenue from merchant vessels. Tehran may be willing to “trade” Hormuz sovereignty for major gains on the nuclear programme, sanctions relief, the release of frozen funds, or a large-scale US withdrawal from the region. All of these “trades” would still be bad from a US perspective and accomplish other key Iranian strategic objectives. US and world vital interests require denying Iran control of the strait by negotiations or by force. Iran likely sees two paths to control: official recognition through an agreement, or maintaining the current situation by firing missiles or drones at ships that fail to comply with Iranian transit demands.

UK UK Domestic Politics

Burnham — Open to Wealth Tax; Abolish IHT, Replace with Social Care Levy

Andy Burnham used Friday’s Makerfield campaign launch to say he would look at proposals from Wes Streeting, the former health secretary, for a wealth tax. Burnham also suggested that inheritance tax could be abolished and replaced with a social care levy paid to fund improvement in the sector. The proposals position the Burnham leadership pitch materially to the left of the 2024 Starmer-Reeves prospectus: alongside his earlier commitments to proportional representation, council tax reform, rail renationalisation and more council houses, the Burnham platform now has a substantive fiscal architecture distinct from the current government.

Dive deeper
Burnham’s allies are reported to be pushing Ed Miliband as his pick for chancellor if he wins Makerfield and replaces Starmer as Labour leader. The wealth-tax framing aligns Burnham explicitly with Streeting’s “first campaign pledges” (the Sure Start restoration funded by a wealth tax, unveiled on Friday) — even as the two contest for the same Tribune-Group-adjacent soft-left base. The IHT-to-social-care-levy idea picks up a long-running social-policy thread: think tanks across the political spectrum have argued for hypothecating funds for adult social care, but no major UK party has so far made an explicit pledge. Burnham is the first senior Labour figure with a realistic leadership prospect to put it formally on the table.

Reeves Rearguard Continues — Allies Warn Bond Markets Reject Miliband

Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s backbench-lobbying push continues this weekend. Reeves has told friends she would like to stay in the chancellorship even under a new prime minister, and her allies are urging MPs to back her if Sir Keir Starmer is replaced later this year. “The biggest fear for the bond markets and the unions is Ed Miliband,” one Labour MP close to Reeves said. “I am concerned that we may lose everything if a new leader sacrifices the chancellor for promises and new alliances they are currently forging with MPs who fancy the job for themselves.” Friends of Reeves believe there is a world in which she survives the transition to a Burnham premiership precisely because it would reassure the markets.

Dive deeper
Reeves this week announced her cost-of-living package — free bus travel for children over the summer holiday, cancelling a planned 5p rise in fuel duty, a VAT reduction from 20% to 5% on tickets for summer attractions (theme parks, zoos and museums), the removal of import tariffs from 100 food items, a VAT cut on children’s meals, and a £120 million support package for the ceramics industry largely based in Stoke-on-Trent. The Stoke component is politically specific: Stoke was won by Boris Johnson’s Tories in 2019, taken back by Labour in 2024, and is now a Reform UK target. Inflation has slowed to 2.8% — the lowest in over a year — with the Bank of England expected to keep interest rates on a downward path.

“Operation Save Starmer” — Burnham Not “Nailed On”; Streeting Failed to Get Numbers

Inside Downing Street, Starmer’s allies now believe they can “Keep Keir In”. On Starmer’s reckoning, as one ally put it, Burnham is far from “nailed on” in Makerfield; and Wes Streeting will have a struggle to get back into the leadership race on favourable terms, having resigned from cabinet only to fail to secure “the numbers”. The Prime Minister broke this week with his aloof communications style by walking across Downing Street to chat directly to the press, and joked publicly about his tongue slip in the Commons about a “North Korea trade deal” (he meant South Korea).

Dive deeper
Starmer believes that those who are pressing for him to go — Ed Miliband (energy secretary), Shabana Mahmood (home secretary), Yvette Cooper (foreign secretary) and Wes Streeting — have underestimated his resilience. His allies say Streeting and Miliband hoped that they could “bully” the Prime Minister into setting out a timeline for his departure without going over the top with the 81 Labour MPs needed to trigger a leadership contest. They conspicuously failed to do so. New figures show the economy growing above expectations, inflation has slowed to 2.8% — the lowest level in over a year — and Reeves’s preferred environment of lower interest rates to protect mortgage holders is likely to remain the Bank of England’s stance with unemployment beginning to rise.

Sunday Politics — “Can Starmer Survive?” Question Dominates Morning Shows

The Sunday morning political shows today are dominated by the leadership question, with the previous week’s edition of the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg explicitly titled “Can Starmer Survive?”. The Makerfield by-election on 18 June is the operational testing ground: a Burnham win is widely seen as the launch pad for a formal leadership challenge; a Burnham loss would, on his allies’ own admission, end his ambitions. Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon — a local plumber who came within 5,399 votes of Josh Simons in 2024 — is the operational test of whether Labour’s migration tightening and Burnham’s personal pull are enough to check Reform’s advance into traditional Labour territory.

Dive deeper
Reform comfortably won every ward in the Makerfield constituency at the 7 May local elections; Burnham himself won 66% of the vote in Wigan in the 2024 Greater Manchester mayoral election. Pollsters have signalled that having Burnham running will significantly boost Labour’s chances of retaining the seat, but the contest remains tough. Lib Dem candidate Jake Austin, a Stockport councillor, is the third candidate. The leadership-and-chancellor question now defines the next four weeks of UK politics ahead of the 18 June Makerfield vote — with Reeves’s rearguard, Burnham’s wealth-tax openness and Starmer’s “Operation Save Starmer” pivot the three strands to watch.
One To Read

How Iran Hopes to Control the Strait of Hormuz: It’s Not Just About Fees

Institute for the Study of War · The analytical frame that sits beneath today’s “largely negotiated” framing dispute: Iran’s primary negotiating objective is sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, more than the per-vessel fee revenue. Tehran may be willing to “trade” this objective for nuclear concessions, sanctions relief, frozen-asset release, or US regional withdrawal — but all such trades are still bad from a US perspective and accomplish other key Iranian strategic objectives. The paper sets out the two paths Iran sees to control: formal US recognition through agreement, or maintaining the current situation by firing missiles or drones at non-compliant ships.
☽

Evening Briefing

Saturday 23 May 2026 — 18:30 BST

What It Means For You

  • Pakistan’s Chief of Defence Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir concluded a “short but highly productive” visit to Tehran on Saturday, Pakistan’s military said, with “encouraging progress” towards a final understanding. But Iran’s top negotiator, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, told Munir Iran “will not compromise on national rights” and called the United States “not an honest party”. Qalibaf warned Iran’s armed forces had “rebuilt their capabilities during the ceasefire” and if Washington “foolishly restarts the war”, the consequences would be “more forceful and bitter” than at the start. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Tehran is in the “final stages of drafting a framework” with a 30-to-60-day timeline for memorandum-of-understanding details — but “deep and significant” disagreements remain.
  • Andy Burnham’s first weekend of Makerfield campaigning has begun. Wes Streeting, who resigned from the Cabinet earlier this month, said in an interview in an interview overnight he had “the numbers including ministers” to launch a leadership bid against Sir Keir Starmer but held off “to give Andy Burnham the chance” to fight Makerfield. “If I’d rushed ahead and triggered a leadership contest before Andy Burnham had the chance to come back, people would have just said I was trying to pull a fast one,” Streeting said in an interview. Streeting also unveiled his “first campaign pledges”: fund the full restoration of Sure Start, paid for by a wealth tax.
  • Iran has launched an “information operation” to frame its protection-racket scheme in the Strait of Hormuz as a legitimate maritime security service. Vessels dealing with Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority have sometimes received payment requests of up to $2 million for safe passage; Reuters reports most ships pay around $150,000. Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE have jointly written to the International Maritime Organization warning that any recognition of Iran’s proposed transit rules “would set a dangerous precedent”. Brent eased to $102.30 at Friday’s close, ten-year gilts at 5.02%; markets re-open Monday with Iran-Pakistan diplomacy as the operational variable.

GEO Geopolitical

Qalibaf to Munir — “Will Not Compromise”; US “Not Honest Party”

Iran’s top negotiator, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, told Pakistan’s Chief of Defence Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir during talks in Tehran on Saturday that the United States was “not an honest party” in negotiations to end the war and that Iran “would not compromise on its national rights”. Qalibaf said Iran would pursue its “legitimate rights”, both on the battlefield and through diplomacy, but added it could not trust “a party that has no honesty at all”. He warned that Iran’s armed forces had “rebuilt their capabilities during the ceasefire” and if the United States “foolishly restarts the war”, the consequences would be “more forceful and bitter” than at the start of the conflict.

Dive deeper
Iranian state media reported that Munir also met President Masoud Pezeshkian in the presence of Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, with whom he had two meetings, before flying out. The talks reportedly centred on a 14-point document proposed by Iran, which Tehran considers the main framework for the discussions, alongside messages exchanged between the two sides. Reuters separately reports that the US side’s offer — presented by Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff — is a one-page memorandum of understanding laying out 14 points to be negotiated over 30 days, including an Iranian moratorium on enriched uranium followed by enrichment limited to 3.67% with intensive IAEA inspection, and an Iranian commitment to export its highly enriched uranium to another country. Iran has firmly rejected handing over its entire HEU stockpile to Washington but has indicated willingness to transfer it to a neutral third country.

Pakistan Army “Encouraging Progress”; Baghaei — Framework in 30-60 Days

Pakistan’s military said in a statement on Saturday that Field Marshal Munir had concluded a “short but highly productive” official visit to Iran, during which “encouraging progress” was made towards reaching a final understanding. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei told state broadcaster IRIB on Saturday that Tehran was in the “final stages of drafting a framework for a deal to end the war with the US”: “Within a reasonable period of 30 to 60 days, the details of these points will be discussed, and a final agreement will ultimately be concluded. We are currently in the process of finalising these memoranda of understanding.” But Baghaei also said Munir’s visit “does not mean we have reached a turning point or a decisive situation”, adding that “deep and significant” disagreements remained.

Dive deeper
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to reporters in New Delhi on Saturday, said “some progress” had been made in the talks, adding: “Even as I speak to you now, there’s some work being done.” ISW separately reports that an unspecified senior Iranian source said both sides had narrowed gaps between their demands, but that Iran’s uranium enrichment and the Strait of Hormuz remain sticking points; an unspecified Pakistani diplomatic source told Al Hadath that closing gaps would not be easy because both sides maintain “high demands”. The Pakistani-Iranian-Qatari coordination remains the broadest multi-party diplomatic push since the April ceasefire, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt also supporting the effort

Iran “Information Operation”; Vessels Paying $150K-$2M for Hormuz Transit

Iran has launched an information operation to frame its protection racket in the Strait of Hormuz as a legitimate maritime security service. The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Navy claimed on 22 May that 35 vessels transited the strait in the past 24 hours after obtaining Iranian “permission” and “security”. this “security” is “effectively protection from attacks by Iranian forces, which is the only force that has threatened shipping in the Strait of Hormuz since February 2026.” Bloomberg reports vessels dealing with Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority have sometimes received payment requests of up to $2 million for safe passage; Reuters reports most ships pay around $150,000.

Dive deeper
The New York Times reported on 21 May that Iran and Oman have discussed a system to charge vessels fees for maritime “services” rather than tolls for passage Iran likely seeks Omani support to legitimise its effort to extend control over the entire strait; Iran’s current control scheme makes territorial claims that infringe upon Emirati and Omani sovereignty. The NYT also reported that Oman initially rejected a partnership with Iran but Omani officials are now signalling willingness to use Oman’s influence with Gulf neighbours and the United States to support the proposed fee system. “A fee and control system under which Iran and Oman control the strait together would still infringe upon Emirati sovereignty.” The Persian Gulf Strait Authority released a new map on 20 May expanding the claimed management zone from Kuh Mobarak in Iran to southern Fujairah in the UAE in the east, and from Gheshm Island in Iran to Umm al Qaiwain in the UAE in the west — an “explicit claim to control over the territorial waters of the UAE and Oman”.

Five Gulf States Joint IMO Statement; “Dangerous Precedent”

Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have jointly written in a statement to the International Maritime Organization that Iran appears to be attempting “to control traffic” through the Strait of Hormuz by forcing vessels to use a route within its territorial waters. The statement warned that any recognition of Iran’s proposed route or the Persian Gulf Strait Authority “would set a dangerous precedent”. “The war cannot end in a way that secures US and allied interests until Iran abandons its effort to control the strait. Recognition or compliance with Iranian transit rules would allow the regime to achieve de facto control over the strait.”

Dive deeper
The UAE’s addition to the joint statement is the most significant escalation: the Persian Gulf Strait Authority’s 20 May map now explicitly claims territorial waters belonging to the UAE and Oman. “Iran’s promise not to attack vessels would not secure freedom of navigation if the regime requires ships to obtain permits, pay fees, or coordinate with IRGC Navy forces. Full freedom of navigation through the strait, therefore, remains a necessary condition for any durable end to the war.” ISW-CTP’s standing assessment: Iranian leaders are positioning Iran to emerge from the war in a stronger strategic position, with veto power over access to the strait. “Iran is therefore not aiming to just ‘survive’ the war.” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has repeatedly stated that an Iranian toll system would be unacceptable and “would make a diplomatic deal unfeasible”.

France Drafts UNSC Resolution for International Hormuz Mission

France has drafted a United Nations Security Council resolution proposing an international mission to restore shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. A competing US-Bahraini proposal faces resistance from Russia and China, which have signalled they may veto the measure. The dispute over control of the strategic waterway has become a key obstacle in efforts to end the US-Israeli war on Iran amid rising oil prices and shipping disruptions. Iran said Saturday that fees and tolls linked to transit through the Strait of Hormuz are part of a “security service” provided to vessels crossing the strategic waterway, as Tehran rejects US threats of escalation and asserts control under what it calls a “new reality”.

Dive deeper
An Iranian official told Al Jazeera that ending the war, lifting the US blockade and ensuring stability in the Strait of Hormuz remain Tehran’s main priorities in ongoing peace talks — lifting sanctions on oil exports and releasing frozen assets are “not details for us”. The official also praised Qatar’s role in supporting Pakistani-led mediation efforts. The French UNSC initiative is the first attempt to internationalise the Hormuz dispute at the Security Council level. The Russia/China veto threat — combined with the US-Bahraini counter-proposal — signals that the strait’s post-war governance will be a P5-level political contest, not just a US-Iran bilateral negotiation. Al Jazeera also reports that the Trump administration is mulling renewed military action against Iran amid fears of regional escalation.

UK UK Domestic Politics

First Weekend of Makerfield Campaigning Begins

The first weekend of campaigning is set to get under way in Makerfield, in a by-election that Andy Burnham has said could “change Labour”. Burnham, who is viewed as a challenger to Sir Keir Starmer in a potential Labour leadership race, launched his by-election campaign on Friday and promised he was not offering “more of the same”. He faces Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon — a plumber who said he is “ready to take on the King of the North” in a reference to Burnham’s nickname — and Liberal Democrat Stockport councillor Jake Austin. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage joined Kenyon on the campaign trail earlier this week and described the by-election as a “David versus Goliath battle”.

Dive deeper
Josh Simons, the Labour MP who stood down to make way for Burnham, won in 2024 by just 5,399 votes, while Reform comfortably won every ward in the constituency at this month’s local elections — Lib Dem candidate Jake Austin said voters in Makerfield “deserve so much more than the failing Labour Government or the divisive politics of Reform UK”. The by-election takes place on 18 June. Pollsters have signalled that having Burnham running will significantly boost Labour’s chances of retaining the seat — but it remains a tough contest. The Reform-vs-Burnham binary is the operational test of whether Labour’s “immigration success story” framing ( editorial) and the Mahmood migration tightening will check Reform UK’s advance into traditional Labour territory.

Streeting’s Mirror Interview — “Numbers Including Ministers”

Wes Streeting, who resigned from the Cabinet earlier this month, said in an interview in an interview overnight that he had “the numbers including ministers” to launch a leadership bid against Sir Keir Starmer but held off “to give Andy Burnham the chance” to fight the Makerfield by-election. “If I’d rushed ahead and triggered a leadership contest before Andy Burnham had the chance to come back, people would have just said I was trying to pull a fast one, trying to get ahead of the competition,” Streeting said. He also unveiled his “first campaign pledges”: fund the full restoration of Sure Start, paid for by a wealth tax.

Dive deeper
Streeting said in an interview: “We need all of our best players on the pitch. We’ve obviously got the Makerfield by-election underway, where Andy Burnham has my full support, and I suspect Andy Burnham would want to be a candidate in a leadership race.” The “numbers including ministers” claim is the most operational disclosure to date of how far the soft-left/centre-Treasury split has organised inside the parliamentary Labour party. Streeting’s Sure Start + wealth tax pitch is positioned as the social-policy counter-frame to Burnham’s constitutional-radicalism positioning (proportional representation, council tax reform, council houses). The Streeting and Burnham campaigns are now visibly competing for the same Tribune-Group-adjacent soft-left base while drawing different policy lines.

Burnham — PR + Council Tax Reform; “Honour Manifestos”

Andy Burnham used the launch of his Makerfield campaign to commit publicly for the first time to wanting a proportional representation pledge in the next Labour manifesto, and to back council tax reform. Asked about the 2024 manifesto, Burnham said: “I think you’ve got to honour manifestos” — appearing to rule out breaking promises Labour made at the general election. He said there is “space to be more radical” within Labour’s 2024 manifesto, including building more council houses and with rail renationalisation.

Dive deeper
The PR commitment is the most explicit constitutional-reform pledge yet from a senior Labour figure with realistic leadership prospects, and aligns Burnham with the Tribune Group soft-left, Compass, and Make Votes Matter long-running positions. Council tax reform — long called for by think tanks across the political spectrum as the most distortive UK tax — would be a significant fiscal-policy lever; if combined with rail renationalisation and more council houses, the Burnham platform is materially to the left of the 2024 Starmer-Reeves prospectus. The “honour manifestos” line is the discipline mechanism: Burnham positions himself as taking the 2024 manifesto seriously while arguing the party has been too timid in delivering its more radical commitments.

Starmer Says “100% Behind” Burnham; Will Campaign in Makerfield

Sir Keir Starmer said on Thursday he would campaign personally in the Makerfield by-election for Andy Burnham. “I want to be part of that, of course I do,” Starmer told reporters. “I’ve said to the whole Labour movement that I want everybody to be involved in the campaign, whatever other discussions are going on. It’s really important — that’s a straight fight between Labour and Reform.” The by-election takes place on 18 June.

Dive deeper
A spokesperson for Burnham said: “Anyone who wants to embrace Andy’s campaign message is welcome on the campaign.” The phrasing leaves the question of whether Burnham would actually want Starmer’s help in the constituency unresolved — an open question that has been a recurring theme through the week’s coverage. Reform UK’s Nigel Farage said that Reform would “throw the kitchen sink” at the by-election and identified easing pressure on social housing as a regional priority. The political theatre of Starmer campaigning for a leadership-rival-in-waiting is the central drama of the next four weeks before the 18 June by-election.
One To Read

Iran Update Special Report, May 22, 2026 — The Hormuz Information Operation

Institute for the Study of War · The clearest analytical framing yet of Iran’s Hormuz strategy: a deliberate “information operation” to relabel the protection racket as a maritime security service, with the IRGC Navy now claiming 35 vessels transited under Iranian “permission” in 24 hours, payment requests of $150,000 to $2 million per ship/Reuters, and the joint statement by Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE to the IMO warning of a “dangerous precedent”. The UAE’s addition to the joint statement — following the PGSA’s 20 May map extending claimed jurisdiction over UAE and Omani territorial waters — is the most consequential Gulf escalation of the post-war period.
☼

Morning Briefing

Saturday 23 May 2026 — 08:15 BST

What It Means For You

  • Pakistan’s Chief of Defence Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir arrived in Tehran on Friday to join Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, who had met Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi twice in two days. A Qatari negotiating team is also in Tehran in coordination with the United States; Secretary of State Marco Rubio said at the NATO foreign ministers’ meeting in Sweden that Pakistan remains the “primary interlocutor”. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei tempered expectations: “deep and extensive differences remain… we cannot necessarily say we have reached a point where a deal is near.” A third Qatari LNG tanker (Al Sahla) is transiting the Strait of Hormuz to China.
  • Chancellor Rachel Reeves has launched a rearguard action to save her job this morning, telling friends she would like to stay even under a new prime minister. Her supporters are now actively lobbying Labour MPs — warning that Burnham’s reported preferred chancellor pick, Ed Miliband, “would not be trusted by the bond markets”. The chancellor question is now, “almost as important as that for prime minister”. Brent has eased further to $102.30; ten-year gilts at 5.02%, down sixteen basis points from Friday a week ago.
  • Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps said on 22 May that 35 vessels have now transited the Strait of Hormuz after obtaining Iranian “permits” and “security” — framed by ISW as the operational rollout of the “mafia-esque protection racket”. Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the International Maritime Organization have all rejected Iran’s claim that the strait is in its territorial waters. The United Nations nuclear non-proliferation treaty review conference concluded last night without agreement after four weeks.

GEO Geopolitical

Pakistan Defence Chief Munir Arrives Tehran; Mediation Enters Decisive Phase

Pakistan’s Chief of Defence Forces, Field Marshal Asim Munir, arrived in Tehran on Friday to join Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, who had met Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi twice in two days. Munir was at the centre of the only direct US-Iran negotiations in April, hosting Vice President JD Vance in Islamabad. A Qatari negotiating team also arrived in Tehran on Friday in coordination with the United States.

Dive deeper
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described Pakistan as Washington’s “primary interlocutor” in the talks at the NATO foreign ministers’ meeting in Sweden, telling reporters Pakistan has done an “admirable job”. “Obviously, other countries have interests, because especially Gulf countries that are, you know, in the middle of all this — they have their own situation going. And we talk to all of them. I would just say that the primary country we’ve been working with on all of this, is Pakistan, and that remains the case.” Rubio also said Washington was in “constant communication” with Munir at the highest levels. The Pakistani-Iranian-Qatari coordination is now the broadest multi-party diplomatic push since the April ceasefire.

Iran’s Baghaei — “Deep and Extensive Differences Remain”; Hopes Tempered

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei tempered expectations of a breakthrough on Friday, saying that “deep and extensive” differences remain between Washington and Tehran. “We cannot necessarily say we have reached a point where a deal is near,” Baghaei said, according to Iran’s state news agency IRNA. The Qatari delegation was holding talks with Foreign Minister Araghchi, Baghaei confirmed, while Pakistan remained the main mediator. Baghaei added that the focus of the current negotiations was ending the war and that nuclear details were “not being discussed at this stage” — consistent with Iran’s position that war-end guarantees must precede detailed nuclear talks.

Dive deeper
The Baghaei framing is in direct contrast to Trump’s earlier-week “begging for a deal” line and to Vance’s “a lot of progress” framing. It is consistent with the Institute for the Study of War’s assessment that nuclear weapons and the Strait of Hormuz remain the two binding sticking points: Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei’s directive on Wednesday that the highly enriched uranium stockpile “should not leave the country” remains operative. Reuters reports Iran has not yet submitted a response to the latest US proposal as multiple mediators — Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt — continue to narrow gaps. Iranian media reported on 21 May that the proposal text has narrowed some gaps “to some extent”, but further progress depends on whether the United States moves away from military threats.

IRGC Says 35 Vessels Obtained “Permits”; Gulf States + IMO Reject

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps said on Friday that 35 vessels have transited the Strait of Hormuz after obtaining Iranian “permits” and “security”. the “security” as “effectively protection from attacks by Iranian forces, which is the only force that has threatened shipping in the Strait of Hormuz since February 2026”. Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the International Maritime Organization have all formally rejected Iran’s claim that the strait is in its territorial waters. “The war cannot end in a way that secures US and allied interests until Iran abandons its effort to control the strait.”

Dive deeper
“Recognition or compliance with Iranian transit rules would allow the regime to achieve de facto control over the strait. Iran’s promise not to attack vessels would not secure freedom of navigation if the regime requires ships to obtain permits, pay fees, or coordinate with IRGC Navy forces.” Iranian Ambassador to France Mohammad Amin Nejad said on 21 May that Iran and Oman are discussing a permanent toll system to formalise control. ISW separately assesses that “Iranian leaders are positioning Iran to emerge from the war in a stronger strategic position, with veto power over access to the strait. Iran is therefore not aiming to just ‘survive’ the war.” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday an Iranian toll system would be “completely illegal” and would “make a diplomatic deal unfeasible”.

UN Non-Proliferation Treaty Conference Concludes Without Agreement

The United Nations nuclear non-proliferation treaty review conference concluded last night after four weeks without an agreement, the Associated Press reports, with the United States and Iran on opposite sides throughout. The US called Iran a “prolific violator of the treaty” and said Tehran spent the conference “evading accountability for its grotesque violations”. Iran accused Washington and its allies of an “implacable campaign” to legitimise “illegal attacks” against the country and its nuclear facilities. The conference, which began on 27 April, ran in parallel to the Pakistani-mediated US-Iran direct negotiating track.

Dive deeper
Tehran has not granted IAEA inspectors access to the nuclear facilities the US bombed in June 2025. The non-agreement at the NPT review conference is the most significant multilateral failure of the post-war diplomatic period and removes one of the principal frameworks that might have given a US-Iran deal multilateral underpinning. The IAEA estimates Iran had 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to 60% at the start of the June 2025 war — the principal stockpile under negotiation. Iran has long denied seeking nuclear weapons; the US position is that the stockpile must be transferred out of Iran. Khamenei’s Wednesday directive that the stockpile “should not leave the country” remains the principal bilateral obstacle.

Third Qatari LNG Tanker Through Hormuz to China; First to Beijing-Direct

A third Qatari liquefied natural gas tanker, the Al Sahla (211,842 cubic metres), is transiting the Strait of Hormuz and heading to China, the first material commercial movement to China direct since the war began. The vessel left Ras Laffan and is expected to arrive at China’s Tianjin LNG terminal on 14 June. The previous two Qatari LNG tankers to make it through the strait since the US-Israeli airstrikes unleashed the war at the end of February were sold by Qatar to Pakistan under a government-to-government deal. Shipments “continue to be erratic”.

Dive deeper
QatarEnergy’s CEO has said that repairs to the export facilities damaged by the conflict could take between three and five years; Qatar’s normal LNG export capacity is 12.8 million metric tons per year. The third tanker’s flow to China — rather than to a Pakistan transit re-sale — is the operational signal that the Iranian protection-racket framework described by ISW yesterday is now operating at the bilateral-agreement level for top-tier strategic partners. India, by contrast, has 13 Indian-flagged vessels and one Indian-owned vessel still stranded on the west side of the strait.

UK UK Domestic Politics

Reeves Rearguard; Allies Warn Bond Markets Would Reject Miliband

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has launched a rearguard action to save her job this morning, telling friends she would like to stay in the post even under a new prime minister. Her supporters have been urging MPs to back her if Sir Keir Starmer is replaced later this year, saying she is the only candidate who can safeguard the country’s finances. Reports have suggested Andy Burnham is considering appointing Energy Secretary Ed Miliband as chancellor if he makes it to No 10. Reeves’ allies are warning that Miliband “would not be trusted by the bond markets, which set the government’s borrowing costs”. One Labour insider: “The fight over who gets to be chancellor is almost as important as that for prime minister.”

Dive deeper
Although Burnham has not commented on who would be his chancellor if he were to win Makerfield and then succeed Starmer, Labour MPs believe Miliband and Reeves would be close to the top of his list. While Miliband has prioritised the green transition throughout his career, Reeves has tended to be more focused on the cost to taxpayers; the two clashed when Starmer and Reeves slashed Labour’s planned green energy scheme while in opposition. “The two may have served in the same cabinet and been close in the past, but they have very different instincts,” one Labour insider said in an interview. The chancellor question is the operational variable for gilt-market pricing through the Makerfield by-election cycle: a Reeves-stays scenario reads materially differently from a Miliband-replacement scenario.

Burnham “Change By-election”; Thinly Veiled No 10 Pitch

Andy Burnham formally launched his Makerfield by-election campaign in Ashton-in-Makerfield on Friday with what the Guardian described as “a barely coded pitch for Downing Street”, saying a vote for him would be “a vote to change Labour”. Burnham: “This is a change by-election. British politics needs to change its tired old script.” And: “I’m prepared to take that fight as high as I can go. I want to play whatever part I can in changing this party back to the party here people used to know.” In a question-and-answer session, Burnham committed for the first time to a specific electoral-reform pledge: he would want a commitment in the next Labour manifesto to introduce a proportional voting system.

Dive deeper
Asked if a vote for him would effectively mean a vote to remove Sir Keir Starmer, Burnham told reporters: “No, it’s not, because this is a by-election, and that’s what this contest is about, and those issues are issues for another time, and they are issues for members of parliament.” Asked if he would want Sir Keir to campaign locally for him, Burnham dodged: “Anyone who agrees with me would be welcome.” The Guardian frames Burnham’s hoped-for return to Westminster, facilitated after Labour MP Josh Simons gave up the seat, as “likely to be followed by a challenge to Starmer, or moves to push him into stepping down, an idea Burnham did nothing to dispel”.

Burnham — Migration “Needs to Fall Further”; Doorstep Concerns

At Friday’s Makerfield campaign launch, Andy Burnham said that UK net migration “needs to fall further”, after Office for National Statistics data on Thursday showed net migration had almost halved to 171,000 in 2025. People on the doorstep, Burnham said, have “raised their concerns about immigration” with him. The Greater Manchester mayor said the latest figures show the “trend is significantly down” but added the government must “get the balance right” on its plans to make it harder for migrants to settle permanently in the UK. The Home Office has forecast around 1.6 million people could settle in the UK between 2026 and 2030 if no further changes are made.

Dive deeper
The Burnham migration framing aligns explicitly with Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s skills-based crackdown and consolidates the move begun in Wednesday’s Guardian report that Burnham’s allies confirmed he would not seek to dilute the government’s migration curbs — including the extension of indefinite leave to remain from five to ten years that Angela Rayner had described as “un-British”. Reform UK’s “open-borders Andy” attack line was the prompting variable; the Friday launch positioning consolidates the move. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has framed the by-election as a “David versus Goliath battle”; their candidate Robert Kenyon — a local plumber who came within 5,399 votes of Josh Simons in 2024 — will be the operational test of whether Burnham’s migration positioning works at the constituency level.

Starmer Says “100% Behind” Burnham; Will Campaign in Makerfield

Sir Keir Starmer told reporters on Thursday he would campaign personally in the Makerfield by-election for Andy Burnham. “I want to be part of that, of course I do,” the Prime Minister said. “I’ve said to the whole Labour movement that I want everybody to be involved in the campaign, whatever other discussions are going on. It’s really important — that’s a straight fight between Labour and Reform.” Asked by reporters whether Burnham would want Starmer’s help, Burnham at his Friday launch dodged the question, telling reporters only that “anyone who agrees with me would be welcome”.

Dive deeper
Burnham said on Thursday that Britain had been “on the wrong path for 40 years”. The Friday Makerfield launch makes the leadership-question subtext fully explicit. The Guardian reported on Wednesday that Burnham’s campaign in Makerfield is being run by two prominent Tribune Group soft-left MPs — Burnham’s close friend Anneliese Midgley and former transport secretary Louise Haigh — signalling the leadership campaign-in-waiting is being staffed by the parliamentary left, not the parliamentary right that Streeting represents. Reform UK’s Nigel Farage said Reform would “throw the kitchen sink” at the by-election and identified easing pressure on social housing as a regional priority.

Mahmood’s Migration “Success Story”; Burnham “Rowed Back”

The Times editorial framed the 171,000 net-migration figure as Labour’s “immigration success story” on Thursday evening — Mahmood’s skills-based programme vindicated after Mahmood “came bottom in a poll of Labour members testing the popularity of cabinet ministers” last month. The Times: “Mr Burnham, who initially echoed Ms Rayner’s sentiments, has rowed back. He appears to realise that the only way to defeat Reform UK in Makerfield, and across the country, is to recognise the visceral power of immigration on the doorstep.” The detoxification framing — if it holds — could check the Reform UK advance into Labour territory.

Dive deeper
The Times notes the irony that “just as Labour is mooting closer ties to the European Union, the figures show what can be done when sovereign immigration powers are wielded effectively”. The 171,000 figure reflects the closure of the visa route for the dependants of students and the introduction of tougher minimum requirements for skilled work visas. The current Labour government has separately announced further plans to reduce migration: a requirement that migrants speak English to A-level standard, and another rise in the skilled worker visa salary threshold to £41,700. The Home Office has forecast around 1.6 million people could settle in the UK between 2026 and 2030 if no further changes are made. The Times editorial bookends the Reeves rearguard chancellor story this Saturday morning by recasting the Labour cabinet narrative around competence rather than crisis.
One To Read

Reeves Makes Case to Remain as Chancellor with Reports Burnham May Favour Miliband

The Guardian · The Saturday-morning Reeves-vs-Miliband chancellor story: the Reeves rearguard, the “bond markets wouldn’t trust Miliband” framing, the soft-left vs Treasury-orthodoxy split inside a hypothetical Burnham cabinet, and the verdict from one Labour insider — “the fight over who gets to be chancellor is almost as important as that for prime minister”. This is the next variable the gilts market will price as the Makerfield by-election approaches.
☽

Evening Briefing

Friday 22 May 2026 — 18:30 BST

What It Means For You

  • Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi met Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Tehran today for a second round of mediation talks. A Qatari negotiating team also arrived in Tehran. A third Qatari LNG tanker (Al Sahla) is transiting the Strait of Hormuz on its way to China. Pakistan and Qatar have drafted a revised memo to bridge US-Iran gaps; Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt are supporting the effort.
  • Andy Burnham formally launched his Makerfield by-election campaign in Ashton-in-Makerfield today — the Guardian frames it as a “thinly veiled pitch for No 10”. Burnham: “This is a change by-election. British politics needs to change its tired old script… I’m prepared to take that fight as high as I can go.” He committed publicly for the first time to wanting a proportional representation pledge in the next Labour manifesto. Sir Keir Starmer said yesterday he would “100% behind” the Labour candidate; The Times editorial today vindicates Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s migration programme as Labour’s “immigration success story”.
  • Ukrainian forces struck Russia’s Syzran Oil Refinery in Samara Oblast yesterday — Rosneft’s plant processing 7-8 million tons of oil per year. Russia and Belarus concluded their joint nuclear-weapons exercise today, involving more than 64,000 personnel and reportedly involving the majority of Russia’s estimated 320 ICBM launchers. Brent has eased further to $102.80; ten-year gilts at 5.02%, off Friday’s 5.18% peak by 16 basis points.

GEO Geopolitical

Pakistan’s Naqvi Meets Araghchi Again in Tehran; Framework Talks

Pakistan’s Interior Minister Syed Mohsin Naqvi met Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Tehran on Friday for a second round of mediation talks aimed at narrowing the gap between Iran and the United States. The discussions focused on developing a framework to resolve the substantive differences; Naqvi delivered the latest US message to the Iranian side two days ago. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said yesterday there were “some good signs” in the talks but that he did not want to be overly optimistic. A senior Iranian source said that while the two sides’ positions have moved closer, uranium enrichment and Hormuz controls remain the largest remaining sticking points.

Dive deeper
The Pakistani-led mediation continues alongside parallel Qatari channels: a Qatari negotiating team arrived in Tehran today, the third Qatari LNG tanker exited the Strait of Hormuz this morning bound for China, and Pakistan and Qatar have jointly drafted a revised memo intended to bridge the US-Iran gaps. The Reuters source describes the strait as having been “practically closed for most shipping” since the 28 February outbreak; before the war, roughly one-fifth of global oil and LNG shipments transited Hormuz. Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt are also supporting the mediation effort, ISW reports, in what is now the broadest multi-party diplomatic push since the April ceasefire.

Third Qatari LNG Tanker Through Hormuz to China; Al Sahla En Route

A third Qatari liquefied natural gas tanker is transiting the Strait of Hormuz today and heading to China, as a Qatari negotiating team arrived in Tehran to try to help secure a deal to end the war with Iran. The vessel, Al Sahla, with a capacity of 211,842 cubic metres, left Ras Laffan and is expected to arrive at China’s Tianjin LNG terminal on 14 June. The previous two Qatari LNG tankers to make it through the strait since the US-Israeli airstrikes unleashed the Iran war at the end of February were sold by Qatar to Pakistan under a government-to-government deal, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Dive deeper
Shipments through the waterway continue to be erratic; this third transit comes nearly two weeks after the first cargo passed through under an Iran-Pakistan arrangement. The third tanker’s flow to China — rather than to a Pakistan transit re-sale — is the operational signal that the Iranian protection-racket framework that ISW described yesterday is now being formalised at the bilateral-agreement level for top-tier strategic partners. QatarEnergy’s CEO has previously said that repairs to the export facilities damaged by the conflict could take between three and five years; Qatar’s normal LNG export capacity is 12.8 million metric tons per year. The Hormuz transit lane through which a fifth of global oil and LNG transited before the war is now functionally controlled by IRGC-set bilateral agreements.

Pakistan-Qatar Revised Memo; Iran-Oman Discussing Permanent Hormuz Toll

Iran has not yet submitted a response to the latest US proposal as multiple mediators continue to narrow gaps. Pakistan and Qatar have drafted a revised memo to bridge US-Iran gaps; Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt are supporting the effort. Iranian media said the proposal has narrowed some gaps “to some extent”, but that further progress depends on whether the United States moves away from military threats. Separately, Iranian Ambassador to France Mohammad Amin Nejad said on 21 May that Iran and Oman are discussing a permanent toll system to formalise Iranian control over maritime traffic through the strait.

Dive deeper
Both US and Iranian officials confirmed on 21 May that nuclear weapons and the Strait of Hormuz remain the two binding “sticking points” in the talks. Secretary of State Marco Rubio yesterday said an Iranian toll system would be “unfeasible” and “completely illegal”; allowing Iran to continue enforcing its protocols would be detrimental to US interests as it would mean Iran could close the strait “anytime it wants”. White House spokesperson Olivia Wales said: “President Trump has been clear on US red lines and will only conclude a deal that prioritises the American people.” The deeper-splits framing covers the fate of Iran’s 440.9 kg highly-enriched uranium stockpile (per IAEA estimate at the start of the June 2025 war) and Tehran’s demand for recognition of its right to enrichment.

Khamenei Directive Hardens Tehran’s Negotiating Position

Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei’s directive yesterday that Iran’s near-weapons-grade uranium stockpile “should not leave the country” continues to harden Tehran’s negotiating position into Friday. Trump told reporters at the White House on Thursday: “We will get it. We don’t need it, we don’t want it. We’ll probably destroy it after we get it.” He also rejected Iran’s proposed Strait of Hormuz transit fees with “It’s an international waterway.” A senior Iranian source said one technical pathway remains open: in-country dilution of the stockpile under IAEA supervision. The IAEA estimates Iran had 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to 60% at the start of the June 2025 war.

Dive deeper
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said in March that what remained of that stockpile was “mainly” stored in a tunnel complex at the Isfahan nuclear facility, with more than 200 kg there and some at Natanz. Iran has separately argued that some highly enriched uranium is needed for medical purposes and for a Tehran research reactor that runs on relatively small amounts of 20%-enriched uranium — a framing that domestically supports the “dilute and store” technical solution but is publicly inconsistent with the Khamenei “directive” framing. The Pakistani-mediated and now Qatari-supplemented channels are the binding diplomatic variables; the “moments” Trump has been describing for ten days are now narrowing into a concrete next-week test of whether the revised memo can move Tehran or whether Trump triggers the “short-notice” renewed strike.

Ukraine Strikes Syzran Refinery; Russia-Belarus Nuclear Exercise Concludes

Ukrainian forces struck the Syzran Oil Refinery in Samara Oblast yesterday. The Rosneft-owned plant has a processing capacity of seven to eight million tons of oil per year and produces gasoline, diesel fuel, aviation kerosene and bitumen. Russia and Belarus today concluded a joint nuclear-weapons exercise that began on 19 May, involving more than 64,000 personnel and over 7,800 pieces of military equipment, including over 200 missile launchers and likely the majority of Russia’s estimated 320 ICBM launchers, according to the Russian Ministry of Defence and BBC Russian Service analysis.

Dive deeper
Russian forces launched 116 drones and one Iskander-M ballistic missile at Ukraine overnight on 20-21 May; Ukraine downed 109 drones. Russian strikes hit residential areas in Dnipro City, injuring 14 civilians, and Konotop in Sumy Oblast, killing one and injuring 12. Ukrainian forces are now “regaining the tactical initiative in different sectors of the frontline” — Ukrainian counterattacks have recaptured much of Kupyansk since November, liberated 400+ square kilometres in southern Ukraine through winter and spring 2026, and liberated several settlements in western Zaporizhia since late April. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov claimed on 19 May that Russia and NATO are “increasingly likely to engage in a direct clash with catastrophic consequences”.

UK UK Domestic Politics

Burnham “Change By-election”; Thinly Veiled Pitch for No 10

Andy Burnham formally launched his Makerfield by-election campaign today with what the Guardian describes as “a barely coded pitch for Downing Street”, saying a vote for him would be “a vote to change Labour”. Speaking at a community sports club car park in Ashton-in-Makerfield, near Wigan, Burnham said: “This is a change by-election. British politics needs to change its tired old script and the people of Makerfield are helping us write one.” And: “I’m prepared to take that fight as high as I can go. I want to play whatever part I can in changing this party back to the party here people used to know, and the party that is solidly on the side of working-class community.”

Dive deeper
In a question-and-answer session with media, Burnham committed publicly for the first time to a specific electoral-reform pledge: “I support electoral reform now. I know there are different ways you can do it, but I believe any move in that direction is going to be good, and I would want a commitment in the next Labour manifesto to introduce a proportional system.” The Guardian frames Burnham’s hoped-for return to Westminster, facilitated after Labour MP Josh Simons gave up the seat, as “likely to be followed by a challenge to Starmer, or moves to push him into stepping down, an idea Burnham did nothing to dispel”. The 18 June by-election remains a straight Labour-vs-Reform UK contest in a Reform-trending Wigan borough where Reform won 24 of 25 council seats at the 7 May local elections.

Burnham — “Trend Significantly Down”; Migration “Needs to Fall Further”

At today’s Makerfield campaign launch, Andy Burnham said that UK net migration “needs to fall further”, after Office for National Statistics data on Thursday showed net migration had almost halved to 171,000 in 2025. People on the doorstep, Burnham said, have “raised their concerns about immigration” with him. The Greater Manchester mayor said the latest figures show the “trend is significantly down” but added the government must “get the balance right” on its plans to make it harder for migrants to settle permanently in the UK. The Home Office has forecast around 1.6 million people could settle in the UK between 2026 and 2030 if no further changes are made.

Dive deeper
Burnham’s explicit endorsement of Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s skills-based migration crackdown is the most substantive policy positioning of his by-election campaign so far. The Guardian reported on Wednesday that Burnham’s allies confirmed he would not seek to dilute the government’s migration curbs — including the extension of indefinite leave to remain from five to ten years that Angela Rayner had described as “un-British”. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has called Burnham “open-borders Andy”; the Friday positioning is designed to close that line of attack. Mahmood has separately announced further measures including a requirement that migrants speak English to A-level standard and an increase in the skilled worker visa salary threshold to £41,700.

The Times Editorial: Mahmood’s Migration “Success Story”; Burnham “Rowed Back”

The Times editorial this evening describes Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s migration programme as “one of [the government’s] few success stories”: the 171,000 net-migration figure for 2025 is the lowest since 2012. The drop, the paper argues, reflects the closure of the visa route for the dependants of students and the introduction of tougher minimum requirements for skilled work visas. The Times: “Mr Burnham, who initially echoed Ms Rayner’s sentiments, has rowed back. He appears to realise that the only way to defeat Reform UK in Makerfield, and across the country, is to recognise the visceral power of immigration on the doorstep.”

Dive deeper
The Times also notes the irony that “just as Labour is mooting closer ties to the European Union, the figures show what can be done when sovereign immigration powers are wielded effectively”. The leader-page framing of Mahmood’s programme as “detoxifying” the immigration issue is the operational political test for the rest of the 18 June by-election campaign: if Reform UK’s “open-borders Andy” attack line continues to bite despite the falling figures, the political effect is on the Burnham leadership question rather than the migration question itself. Mahmood last month came bottom in a poll of Labour members testing cabinet-minister popularity.

Starmer Says “100% Behind” Burnham; Will Campaign in Makerfield

Sir Keir Starmer told reporters on a visit to Essex yesterday he would “100% behind” Labour’s Makerfield candidate — Andy Burnham — and would personally campaign in the by-election on 18 June. “I want to be part of that, of course I do,” the Prime Minister said. “I’ve said to the whole Labour movement that I want everybody to be involved in the campaign, whatever other discussions are going on. It’s really important — that’s a straight fight between Labour and Reform.” A spokesperson for Burnham responded: “Anyone who wants to embrace Andy’s campaign message is welcome on the campaign.” Burnham’s message, has been “different”.

Dive deeper
Burnham said on Thursday that Britain had been “on the wrong path for 40 years”. The Friday Makerfield launch makes the leadership-question subtext fully explicit. The Guardian reported on Wednesday that Burnham’s campaign in Makerfield is being run by two prominent Tribune Group MPs from the Labour soft left: Burnham’s close friend Anneliese Midgley and former transport secretary Louise Haigh — signalling that the leadership campaign-in-waiting is being staffed by the parliamentary left, not the parliamentary right that Streeting represents. Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon — the local plumber who came within 5,399 votes of Josh Simons in 2024 — is the Reform candidate; the 7 May local elections in Wigan saw Reform UK win 24 of 25 council seats.

Burnham Backs Mahmood Immigration Changes; Soft-Left Allies Run Campaign

Andy Burnham is backing Shabana Mahmood’s controversial changes to the immigration system, his allies said in an interview on Wednesday, in a blow to those in Labour who hoped to soften them. Those close to Burnham’s campaign say he will not seek to dilute the government’s migration curbs, which include ending the right to permanent refugee status. “Andy is fighting the most important by-election in half a century in the Labour-held seat with the largest Reform vote in the country,” a source close to the campaign said in an interview. “Immigration is the second most important issue there. He must show decisive leadership on this and reframe but back the reforms.”

Dive deeper
The Burnham positioning explicitly resolves a Wednesday-evening Labour soft-left split: Angela Rayner had described Mahmood’s proposal to extend indefinite leave to remain from five to ten years as “un-British”, but Burnham’s allies have now staked out a different ground. In an email to MPs on Wednesday, Burnham’s team announced that two prominent Tribune Group MPs — Anneliese Midgley and Louise Haigh — would run the Makerfield campaign. The Guardian framing: Burnham “backed away from his previous support for the idea of rejoining the EU earlier this week, saying it was not something he wanted to see in the immediate future”. The Reform UK “open-borders Andy” attack line, was the prompting variable.
One To Read

Burnham Starts By-election Campaign with Thinly Veiled Pitch for No 10

The Guardian · The single best account of today’s Makerfield campaign launch — the “change by-election” framing, the “tired old script” quote, the first explicit proportional-representation pledge, and the Guardian’s framing that Burnham’s return is “likely to be followed by a challenge to Starmer, or moves to push him into stepping down, an idea Burnham did nothing to dispel”. The diagnostic moment of the Labour leadership question is now formally underway.
☼

Morning Briefing

Friday 22 May 2026 — 08:15 BST

What It Means For You

  • Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has issued a directive that Iran’s near-weapons-grade uranium must remain inside the country. President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Thursday that the United States “will get” the stockpile anyway and would “probably destroy it” afterwards; he also rejected Iran’s proposed Strait of Hormuz transit fees with “It’s an international waterway.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters the tolls would “make a diplomatic deal unfeasible” but said there were “some good signs”. Brent has eased further to $103.60.
  • UK net migration fell sharply to 171,000 last year, the lowest level since the COVID pandemic and the lowest non-pandemic figure since 2012. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the data showed his government was “delivering” on its promise to regain control of UK borders, adding: “I know there’s more to do.” Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham said today the migration trend is “significantly down” but “needs to fall further” — bracketing the Burnham Makerfield campaign with Home Office Shabana Mahmood’s skills-based migration programme.
  • The London mayor Sadiq Khan has blocked a £50 million Met Police-Palantir AI contract, citing a “clear and serious breach” of procurement rules. Palantir’s UK head Louis Mosley hit back at the mayor today, accusing him of “putting politics above public safety”. The block is the largest UK police rejection of US AI procurement to date and creates a substantive policy split inside Labour over Palantir’s expanding NHS and policing footprint.

GEO Geopolitical

Khamenei Directive; Uranium “Should Not Leave the Country”

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei has issued a directive that Iran’s near-weapons-grade uranium “should not leave the country” on Thursday citing two senior Iranian sources, hardening Tehran’s stance on one of the central US demands in the peace talks. “The Supreme Leader’s directive, and the consensus within the establishment, is that the stockpile of enriched uranium should not leave the country,” one of the sources said. Iran’s top officials believe that sending the material abroad would leave the country “more vulnerable to future attacks by the United States and Israel”. Israeli officials have separately said that Trump has assured Israel that the stockpile “will be sent out of Iran” — an assurance now in direct contradiction with the Khamenei directive.

Dive deeper
Before the war, Iran signalled willingness to ship out half of its 60%-enriched uranium stockpile; that position changed after repeated Trump threats. “There are solutions like diluting the stockpile under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency,” one of the Iranian sources said — suggesting Tehran’s preferred technical pathway is in-country dilution rather than transfer. The IAEA estimates Iran had 440.9 kg of uranium enriched to 60% when Israel and the US attacked Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025; IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said in March that what remained of that stock was “mainly” stored in a tunnel complex at the Isfahan nuclear facility with more than 200 kg there, and some at Natanz. The two sides have started to narrow some gaps, the Reuters sources said, but deeper splits remain over the fate of the stockpile and Iran’s demand for recognition of its right to enrichment.

Trump “We Will Get It”; Hormuz “International Waterway”

President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Thursday that the United States “will get” Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium — in direct response to the Khamenei directive. “We will get it. We don’t need it, we don’t want it. We’ll probably destroy it after we get it, but we’re not going to let them have it,” Trump said. He separately rejected Iran’s proposed Strait of Hormuz transit fees: “We want it open, we want it free. We don’t want tolls. It’s an international waterway.” Trump remains ready to resume strikes “if we don’t get the right answers” from Iran’s leadership.

Dive deeper
Reuters reports Iran’s top peace negotiator Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf told Iranian outlets on Wednesday that “obvious and hidden moves by the enemy” showed the Americans were preparing new attacks. Trump’s week opened with him telling reporters on Tuesday: “I was an hour away from making the decision to go today.” Iran’s leaders are “begging for a deal”, Trump said, adding a new US attack would happen “in coming days” if no agreement was reached. Tehran’s latest offer to Washington largely repeats terms Trump previously rejected: control of the Strait of Hormuz, compensation for war damage, lifting of sanctions, release of frozen assets, withdrawal of US troops. Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister restated Tehran’s claims to sovereignty over the strait on Thursday, saying aggression from the US, Israel and some regional states had “fundamentally altered security in the waterway”.

Rubio “Hormuz Tolls Make Deal Unfeasible”; “Completely Illegal”

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters on Thursday that a diplomatic deal between the United States and Iran would be “unfeasible” if Tehran implemented a tolling system in the Strait of Hormuz. “No one in the world is in favour of the tolling system. It can’t happen. It would be unacceptable. It would make a diplomatic deal unfeasible if they were to continue to pursue that. So it’s a threat to the world if they were trying to do that, and it’s completely illegal,” Rubio said. He acknowledged there had been “some progress” in talks with Tehran but said Washington was dealing with “a system that itself is a little fractured”. “There’s some good signs… I don’t want to be overly optimistic.”

Dive deeper
The Rubio framing — “a system that itself is a little fractured” — tracks Vice President JD Vance’s Tuesday White House press-briefing line that the difficulty of negotiation is the “fractured Iranian leadership”. Both phrasings pass responsibility for any breakdown onto Tehran rather than Washington. Reuters has separately reported that both US and Iranian officials say nuclear weapons and the Strait of Hormuz remain the two binding “sticking points”. The Pakistani-led mediation channel continues; Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi travelled to Tehran on Tuesday for further talks. Trump on Thursday reposted a New York Post op-ed by Richard Goldberg of the Foundation for Defence of Democracies titled “Here’s how to crush Tehran in three moves” — the diplomatic-and-military oscillation continues.

Iran “Mafia-Esque Protection Racket”; $150,000 Per-Transit Fee

The Institute for the Study of War continues to assess that Iran is using the ceasefire to “normalize Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz” via a multi-tiered transit-fee scheme run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. Russia and China sit at the top tier as strategic partners; India and Pakistan operate under negotiated bilateral agreements; other states are case-by-case; vessels linked to Iranian adversaries are denied access; ships without a bilateral framework pay approximately $150,000 per transit. the fees as “part of a mafia-esque protection racket in which the vessels pay Iran so that the Iranian navy can ‘secure’ the vessels against an attack by the Iranian navy or Iranian shore-based missiles and drones”.

Dive deeper
Sixteen vessels took Iran’s route through the strait in the twenty-four hours to 2pm ET 20 May — including two Chinese and Hong Kong-flagged VLCCs, a South Korean-flagged VLCC, a Turkish-owned vessel exiting and an Indian-flagged vessel entering. The Wall Street Journal separately reported on Tuesday that US forces seized the Iran-linked oil tanker M/T Skywave between 19 and 20 May; US Marines also boarded the Iranian-flagged tanker M/T Celestial Sea on 20 May before releasing it. The IRGC threatened on 20 May to expand any renewed war “far beyond the region” — capabilities listed include terror attacks abroad, Bab el-Mandeb shipping disruption via the Houthis, and intermediate-range ballistic missile strikes (Iran demonstrated nascent 4,000km range against Diego Garcia in March). CENTCOM has now redirected 91 vessels and disabled four since the 13 April blockade began.

India Won’t Send More Tankers Until 13 Stranded Ships Return

India’s government wants to secure the return of its ships stranded in the Gulf before sending any vessels back to load fuel. India will send vessels to the west of the Strait of Hormuz “whenever the situation becomes conducive”, the official added. Thirteen Indian-flagged vessels and one Indian-owned vessel are still stuck on the west side of the strait. Thirteen vessels loaded with energy cargoes — mostly liquefied petroleum gas, used for cooking in India — have so far transited out of the strait since its effective closure on 28 February.

Dive deeper
India sourced more than 40% of its crude oil imports and about 90% of its LPG from the Middle East through the Strait of Hormuz before the war — the only Asian economy more exposed to the Hormuz disruption than China. India’s shipping ministry is coordinating with the foreign ministry on when to resume sending vessels; the decision will be taken after all stranded ships return. The Iranian Persian Gulf Strait Authority framework would, under ISW’s reading, place India in the second tier of the IRGC’s multi-tier fee structure — i.e. India can operate under a negotiated bilateral agreement rather than the per-transit $150,000 fee. Whether New Delhi will agree to that framework once stranded ships return is the operational test of the IRGC normalisation strategy.

UK UK Domestic Politics

UK Net Migration 171,000; Lowest Non-Pandemic Figure Since 2012

UK net migration fell to 171,000 in 2025 — the lowest level since the COVID pandemic and the lowest non-pandemic figure since 2012 — according to Office for National Statistics data released on Thursday. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the data showed his government was “delivering”, adding: “I know there’s more to do, we’re introducing a skills-based migration system that rewards contribution and ends our reliance on cheap overseas workers.” The Home Office said on X: “We are ending Britain’s reliance on overseas labour, ensuring migrants contribute more than they take and are increasing the removal of illegal migrants and foreign criminals.”

Dive deeper
Policy changes from early 2024 under the former Conservative government likely contributed: most overseas students were restricted from bringing family members; care workers were restricted from bringing dependents; the general skilled-visa salary threshold rose from £26,200 to £38,700; the minimum income requirement to sponsor someone for a family visa rose by more than £10,000. Critics of the previous government dubbed the earlier increase the “Boriswave”, with insiders telling the BBC the 2024 measures helped bring numbers down. The current Labour government has separately announced further plans to reduce migration: a requirement that migrants speak English to A-level standard, and another rise in the skilled worker visa salary threshold to £41,700. The Home Office forecasts around 1.6 million people could settle in the UK between 2026 and 2030 if no further changes are made.

Burnham (BBC): Net Migration “Needs to Fall Further”; Trend “Significantly Down”

Andy Burnham said today that UK net migration “needs to fall further”, after Home Office figures showed it had almost halved since 2024. The Greater Manchester mayor said the latest figures — net migration of 171,000 in 2025 — show the “trend is significantly down”. The intervention firmly aligns Burnham with Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s skills-based crackdown ahead of his 18 June Makerfield by-election, where Reform UK’s “Brexit betrayal” attack line will test his migration positioning directly. The Home Office has forecast that around 1.6 million people could settle in the UK between 2026 and 2030 if no further changes are made.

Dive deeper
Burnham also said in an interview the government must “get the balance right” on its plans to make it harder for migrants to settle permanently in the UK — an implicit boundary marker between his position and the Reform UK Makerfield campaign. The 75,000 Britons aged 16-34 leaving in the same period is the empirical counter-argument: net migration is falling not only because fewer people are arriving, but because more young Britons are leaving. The Burnham migration framing is consistent with his Tuesday Leeds-speech move toward the right of his economic-pitch positioning and tracks the Tuesday Times/YouGov poll showing Burnham 59-37 against Sir Keir Starmer in a head-to-head members’ ballot.

Khan Blocks Met-Palantir £50m; “Clear and Serious Breach”

London mayor Sadiq Khan has blocked a £50 million contract between the Metropolitan Police and the controversial US tech company Palantir, with City Hall citing a “clear and serious breach” of procurement rules. Scotland Yard had been in talks to use Palantir’s AI technology to automate intelligence analysis in criminal investigations. The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime withheld approval, saying Scotland Yard had seriously engaged with only one potential supplier and that the Met risked becoming locked into Palantir’s technology. Mopac said the proposed deal had not “ensured or demonstrated value for money”.

Dive deeper
Deputy mayor for policing and crime Kaya Comer-Schwartz wrote to Met Commissioner Mark Rowley: “I have not been provided with any acceptable explanation for this failure, which I regard as a clear and serious breach of the applicable procedural requirements.” The procurement process, she said, had created “legal and reputation risks”. The Met had originally costed the contract at £15-£25 million a year; the proposed deal was at the top of that range. Palantir was co-founded by Peter Thiel and signed a seven-year £330 million deal with NHS England in 2023 for its Foundry federated-data system. Cross-party MPs called last month for the NHS contract to be cancelled, describing Palantir as “shameful” over patient-data security concerns.

Palantir Hits Back; Accuses Khan of “Politics Above Public Safety”

Palantir has accused Sir Sadiq Khan of “putting politics above public safety” after the London mayor blocked its £50 million Met Police contract. Louis Mosley, who heads Palantir in the UK and Europe, accused Khan of politicising procurement: “What Londoners value is not being mugged, not being raped by a serving police officer.” The block has created tensions inside Labour over the party’s broader engagement with the Palantir AI/data platform. Scotland Yard described the move as “disappointing”, adding that without new technology its ability to keep London safe would be compromised.

Dive deeper
Scotland Yard had initially appointed Palantir on a separate deal worth less than £500,000 — below the threshold for Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime scrutiny — to use AI to detect rogue officers by scanning rosters and other systems. The Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers, criticised that initial deal as a “big brother system” and the “unchecked use of a controversial provider to spy on every single one of our colleagues”. The Met had wanted to extend Palantir’s involvement to scanning criminal intelligence data for patterns and clues, as it already does for Bedfordshire and Leicestershire. The Khan block sets a precedent for UK police-AI procurement and reopens the wider question of whether Palantir’s NHS Foundry contract can continue to operate as planned.

Andrew Trade Envoy Files Released; Queen “Very Keen”

Newly released government files suggest the late Queen Elizabeth II was “very keen” for Prince Andrew to be made a UK trade envoy. The documents, released yesterday, highlight the role of the Queen and show “no evidence” of a formal vetting process around the appointment. The files release lands alongside continuing police interest in Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor; the BBC notes the contemporary political context of the cabinet-level interest in how the appointment was made. The Aston Villa Europa League victory bus parade in Birmingham — the headline counter-news image of the day — ran in parallel through the late-Thursday news cycle.

Dive deeper
The trade envoy appointment was made in 2011 under the David Cameron coalition government. The BBC reports the released files reveal the Queen pressed for the appointment without a formal vetting process; former Cabinet Secretary Lord Turnbull was interviewed for BBC Radio 4’s World at One. The disclosure comes in a politically delicate week: the cabinet ring-fence around Sir Keir Starmer’s leadership has begun to hold operationally, but the cumulative political pressure on the Labour government from the Tameside fraud arrests, the Burnham migration positioning, the Khan-Palantir block and the Andrew files release together create the substantive UK news-cycle pattern for the Friday papers.
One To Read

Exclusive: Supreme Leader Says Enriched Uranium Must Stay in Iran

Reuters · The single most consequential foreign-policy story of the week: the Khamenei directive that Iran’s near-weapons-grade uranium must remain in Iran, set against Trump’s parallel “We will get it” quote and the assurances Trump has reportedly given Israel that the stockpile will be sent out. Reuters has the IAEA 440.9 kg figure, the “dilution under IAEA supervision” alternative the Iranian source floats, and the deeper read of why the two sides are now further apart on the core question than at any point since the April ceasefire.
☽

Evening Briefing

Thursday 21 May 2026 — 18:30 BST

What It Means For You

  • Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered a cost-of-living statement to the Commons today: a 10p increase in the tax-free mileage rate to 55p (backdated to April, the first rise in fifteen years), VAT on summer-attraction tickets cut to 5%, tariffs scrapped on 100 imported food items, free child bus travel through the summer holidays, and a £120 million package for the Stoke-on-Trent ceramics industry — politically targeted at the Labour-Reform Wigan-style battleground there. The supermarket food-price cap and energy-bill cap that had been floated were both quietly absent. The Independent’s David Maddox: this was “proof of life for a government which many think is dead”.
  • Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has issued a directive that the country’s near-weapons-grade uranium must remain inside Iran, rather than being transferred abroad. Khamenei also said abandoning uranium enrichment would be “100% against the country’s national interest”. The directive directly rejects the central US negotiating demand and contradicts even the conditional dilution-and-send-to-Russia proposal Iran floated this week. Trump and Vance’s Tuesday optimism reads materially differently this evening; Brent eased further to $104.40 nonetheless.
  • Iran is using the ceasefire to run a “mafia-esque protection racket” over the Strait of Hormuz, charging vessels without a bilateral agreement around $150,000 a transit to be “secured” against attacks by the Iranian navy itself. Sixteen vessels took Iran’s route through the strait in the past twenty-four hours. The normalisation strategy is designed to gradually rebuild near pre-war traffic flows before the European-led NATO escort framework can be activated in July — deliberately weakening the case for it.

GEO Geopolitical

Khamenei: Uranium Must Stay in Iran; Abandoning Enrichment “100% Against Interests”

Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has issued a directive that the country’s near-weapons-grade uranium must remain inside Iran. Khamenei also said abandoning uranium enrichment would be “100 percent against the country’s national interest”. The directive directly rejects the central US demand — that Iran hand over its highly enriched uranium to the United States — and contradicts even the conditional proposal Iran floated this week to dilute some of the stockpile and send the rest to Russia with a right to “reclaim it”. Iran has separately warned it may enrich uranium to 90% purity (weapons-grade) if it faces another military attack.

Dive deeper
The Khamenei directive lands twenty-four hours after Vice President JD Vance told a White House press briefing that the United States and Iran had made “a lot of progress” in their talks and that “neither side wants to see a resumption of the military campaign”, and twenty-four hours after President Trump said he had been “an hour away” from ordering the cancelled US strike. The Wall Street Journal separately reported on Tuesday that Iran is currently unable to enrich uranium because the fissile material is buried under rubble from the June 2025 12-Day War strikes on Natanz, Fordow and Esfahan — meaning the operational stake of the directive is the post-rebuild scenario, not the immediate one. The Institute for the Study of War continues to assess the two sides’ positions as “fundamentally incompatible”; the Pakistani-mediated channel via Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi’s Tuesday Tehran visit remains the active diplomatic track.

Iran “Mafia-Esque Protection Racket” over Hormuz; $150,000 Fee

Iran is using the ceasefire period to “normalize Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz” via a multi-tiered transit-fee scheme run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. Russia and China sit at the top tier as strategic partners; India and Pakistan operate under negotiated bilateral agreements; other states are case-by-case; ships linked to Iranian adversaries are denied access; ships without a bilateral framework pay around $150,000 per transit. the fees as “part of a mafia-esque protection racket in which the vessels pay Iran so that the Iranian navy can ‘secure’ the vessels against an attack by the Iranian navy or Iranian shore-based missiles and drones”.

Dive deeper
16 vessels taking Iran’s route through the strait between 2pm ET 19 May and 2pm ET 20 May, including two Chinese and Hong Kong-flagged VLCCs, a South Korean-flagged VLCC, a Turkish-owned vessel exiting and an Indian-flagged vessel entering. The Iraqi Government, under former PM Mohammad Shia al Sudani, reportedly reached an ad hoc agreement with Iran to facilitate the Greek-owned, Maltese-flagged Very Large Crude Carrier Agios Fanourios I on 10 May. The strategic objective of the normalisation effort, ISW assesses, is to gradually return strait traffic to near pre-war levels before the European-led NATO escort framework can be activated in July — weakening the political case for mobilising US allies to reopen the strait. The post-war “security” deployment that the UK and France have floated, ISW judges, would face Iranian forceful resistance if the war ends with official or de facto recognition of Iranian sovereignty over the strait.

US: Skywave Seized, Celestial Sea Boarded; 91 Vessels Redirected

The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that three US officials confirmed US forces seized the US-sanctioned, Iranian-linked oil tanker M/T Skywave (IMO 9328716) between 19 and 20 May after it transited the Strait of Malacca on 14 May. US Central Command separately reported on 20 May that US Marines boarded the Iranian-flagged oil tanker M/T Celestial Sea (IMO 9397030) on suspicion of attempting to reach an Iranian port; US forces released the vessel after searching it and directing it to change course. CENTCOM has now redirected 91 commercial vessels and disabled four since the 13 April blockade on Iranian ports began.

Dive deeper
The Skywave was sanctioned by the US Treasury Department on 13 March for its role in transporting Iranian oil. Commercially available ship-tracking data showed the Skywave transited the Strait of Malacca on 14 May, then returned to the Indian Ocean on 19 May presumably after being seized. The escalating physical interdiction of Iranian oil shipments — combined with the Monday Amin Exchange + 19-vessel Treasury designation — is the operational side of the coercive-diplomacy posture Vance and Trump articulated this week. The IRGC’s 20 May threat to expand any renewed war “far beyond the region” is the corresponding Iranian deterrent posture; ISW lists three operationalisation channels — terror attacks abroad, Bab el-Mandeb shipping via the Houthis, and intermediate-range ballistic missile strikes (Iran demonstrated nascent 4,000km range against the US-UK Diego Garcia base in March).

Pakistan-Saudi Pact: 8,000 Troops, Jet Squadron, Air Defence Sent

On Tuesday that Pakistan has sent 8,000 troops, a squadron of fighter jets and an air defence system to Saudi Arabia as part of the September 2025 mutual defence pact, citing three security officials and two government sources who described the force as “substantial” and “combat-ready”. The aircraft were sent in April; the other assets at an unspecified later date. The deployment is required to uphold the pact in the context of repeated Iranian attacks on Saudi Arabia. Pakistan’s simultaneous mediation between Washington and Tehran, including Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi’s 20 May Tehran visit, demonstrates Islamabad’s political-influence positioning in the region.

Dive deeper
A resumption of the war could challenge Pakistan’s commitments to the Saudi agreement in new ways, ISW notes, which makes Islamabad invested in avoiding a return to conflict and explains the simultaneous mediation role. Qatar has also been playing a parallel mediating role, ISW reports, possibly causing tensions with Pakistan; an Arab official told Axios on 20 May that Qatar sent a delegation to Iran to obtain more tangible nuclear commitments from Tehran and more specifics from the United States on the release of Iran’s frozen assets. The triangular mediation structure (Pakistan + Qatar + the United Arab Emirates/Saudi Arabia direct intervention) is a significant change from earlier phases of the war when Pakistan was the sole channel.

Hezbollah Prolonged Engagement with IDF at Haddatha; First Since Ceasefire

Hezbollah defended against an Israel Defence Forces ground assault on the village of Haddatha in the Bint Jbeil District of southern Lebanon on 19 and 20 May. Hezbollah used small arms, mortars, RPGs, anti-tank guided missiles and FPV drones to defend through two attacks, a seven-hour engagement on 19 May and a four-hour one on 20 May. Hezbollah claimed to have repelled the first attack but did not claim to have repelled the second; MTV Lebanon reported IDF units destroyed homes in Haddatha after the second engagement, suggesting that the IDF dislodged Hezbollah.

Dive deeper
Hezbollah has typically avoided prolonged ground engagements since the ceasefire began, conducting most attacks using indirect fire (rockets and drones) rather than direct defence. The Haddatha engagement is therefore tactically and politically significant: it suggests Hezbollah either chose to make a stand for operational reasons (covering the withdrawal of important assets or personnel) or has reorganised to conduct combined-arms defence with embedded drone operators. Israeli ground forces have operated near Haddatha at least six times since 13 May. ISW separately notes that Hezbollah FPV drones now cause the majority of IDF deaths in southern Lebanon since the ceasefire, and Israeli public broadcaster Kan has reported that Hezbollah drones have affected 70 to 80 percent of Israeli forces’ freedom of movement in southern Lebanon — restricting most units to night-time movement.

UK UK Domestic Politics

Reeves: 10p Mileage Rise to 55p; First Raise in 15 Years

Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in the Commons this morning a 10p per mile increase in the tax-free mileage rate, taking it from 45p to 55p, backdated to April 2026 (2026-27 tax year). The increase is the first since 2011, when George Osborne raised the rate from 40p to 45p. MoneySavingExpert quoted Martin Lewis describing it as a “really important change” for drivers; the Birmingham Mail calculated the average benefit at £120 per year. The mileage increase is, the Independent argues, “the biggest help in the measures” in today’s package — specifically aimed at the “white van man and woman” constituency that Sir Keir Starmer has been referencing.

Dive deeper
The mileage rise comes on top of yesterday’s PMQs announcement of a 5p fuel duty cut extension through the end of 2026 and a twelve-month vehicle excise duty holiday for the haulage industry. The combined package costs approximately £400 million on the Wednesday side, with the mileage adjustment funded as part of the wider Reeves Thursday programme. The Treasury framing — that funding comes out of the “fastest-growing economy in the G7” growth dividend rather than fresh borrowing — is being tested through the Thursday-afternoon gilt market reaction; the ten-year gilt yield is currently at 5.06%, half a point off Friday’s 5.18% peak.

Reeves Package: VAT Cut on Attractions, 100 Food Tariffs Removed, £120m Ceramics

The wider Reeves cost-of-living package announced today, includes a VAT reduction from 20% to 5% on tickets for summer attractions (theme parks, zoos and museums); free bus travel for children over the summer holiday; the removal of import tariffs from 100 food items including biscuits and baked beans; a VAT cut on children’s meals; and a £120 million support package for the ceramics industry largely based in Stoke-on-Trent. The Stoke component is politically specific: Stoke was won by Boris Johnson’s Tories in 2019, taken back by Labour in 2024, and is now a Reform UK target. Ceramics is also important for the aerospace sector.

Dive deeper
Two of the most heavily-trailed cap mechanics are notably absent: the supermarket food price cap (dropped Wednesday after a sharp retail backlash) and the energy bill cap that has been calculated as unaffordable. The Liz Truss September 2022 energy-bill-cap fiscal blow-up is the explicit precedent. The Independent’s David Maddox: “the chancellor ducked a war with supermarkets… She also avoided a package to cap energy bills — almost certainly because she could not afford it”. The Reeves Thursday statement is best read as a calibrated political holding action: substantive enough to offer Labour a domestic-policy narrative against the leadership-crisis news cycle, but with no measure significant enough to materially alter the fiscal envelope for the autumn Budget.

“Proof of Life” for a Government “Many Think is Dead”

The Independent’s Political Editor David Maddox framed today’s Reeves announcement as “proof of life for a government which many think is dead”: “The context is that this is a government teetering on collapse. The prime minister could be replaced before the summer and his chancellor Ms Reeves will surely follow him out of the exit door.” The uncertainty, Maddox argues, “ties the hands of ministers in attempting to do anything significant” — so the package is “more about reminding people that Keir Starmer’s government is still alive and still trying to do something even if it is not much”. Reeves’s own defence is that “the fundamentals are right” and that the IMF has “upgraded the low forecast on growth”.

Dive deeper
The Maddox framing is the diagnostic frame the Burnham camp will run against: the cabinet ring-fence is operationally holding the political news cycle, but the structural challenge — Burnham’s confirmation Wednesday as Labour’s Makerfield candidate, the Times/YouGov poll showing 59-37 against Starmer in a members’ ballot, the Independent’s parallel YouGov result on 47% Labour-member backing — remains in place. The Reform UK “Plucky Plumber” Robert Kenyon Makerfield campaign opens formally tomorrow; the 18 June by-election day is now four weeks out. The Reeves cost-of-living package will be tested against the Friday market open and the YouGov polling cycle through next week.

Burnham (Yesterday): “100%” Understand Why People Want Starmer to Step Down

Andy Burnham’s first sit-down television interview since being confirmed as Labour’s Makerfield by-election candidate, given to ITV News’s Daniel Hewitt yesterday, continues to drive Thursday’s news cycle. Burnham said he “100%” understands why people want Sir Keir Starmer to step down: “They’re sending a message.” He confirmed that becoming an MP would be the “first step” on the path to a Labour leadership challenge. “I’ve indicated always in my role as mayor that one day I will seek to return to Westminster,” he said. The framing politely contradicts Lammy’s “back on the pitch” and Nandy’s “froth and nonsense” lines.

Dive deeper
Reform UK’s “Plucky Plumber” Robert Kenyon, unveiled minutes after the Burnham Wednesday confirmation, will accuse Burnham at the start of the by-election campaign of treating Makerfield as a “stepping stone” and attack the Cambridge-educated former special-adviser background. The Greens are due to name their candidate this evening; the Conservatives within twenty-four hours. The Wigan-borough Reform sweep of 24/25 council seats two weeks ago is the empirical baseline; Burnham’s own 66% mayoral vote in Wigan in 2024 is the counter-baseline. The Restore Britain rightwing party’s candidate Rebecca Shepherd may split Reform’s vote; the Greens and Conservatives will split anti-Reform and anti-Labour votes respectively.

Conservatives: Reeves Package “Sticking Plaster”; Mileage Welcomed

The Conservative response to today’s Reeves announcement has been to welcome the mileage rise and fuel duty extension while framing the wider package as a “sticking plaster” against the Iran-war inflation backdrop. The wider Conservative attack line — Kemi Badenoch’s yesterday-PMQs claim of credit for the fuel duty “U-turn”, and her reference to Labour MPs having voted to ban new British oil and gas licences — continues. Starmer’s Wednesday-PMQs “Eurovision/FA Cup” riposte remains the operative Number 10 framing of the Conservative leadership’s positioning.

Dive deeper
The substantive Conservative challenge is whether the energy-licence stance can be politically reconciled with a fuel-price stabilisation programme — the Badenoch argument is no. The Liberal Democrat response has emphasised the absence of an energy bill cap and the absence of substantive food-cost intervention now that the supermarket cap has been dropped. The SNP’s pledge to use devolved public health powers to fix prices on twenty to fifty essential items in Scotland is now the only operational price-cap framework on the UK table, and could become a Scottish-Westminster test case if launched. Reform UK’s focus is the Makerfield by-election campaign launching tomorrow; Farage has previously told GB News he will “throw absolutely everything” at it.
One To Read

Iran Update Special Report, 20 May 2026

Institute for the Study of War · Nadia Sleiman’s most analytically rigorous account of the Iranian “mafia-esque protection racket” over the Strait of Hormuz: the multi-tiered IRGC fee scheme, the $150,000 per-transit charge, the Iraqi government’s already-active ad hoc agreements, the sixteen vessels taking Iran’s route in twenty-four hours, and the deliberate strategic objective of returning traffic flows to near pre-war levels before the European-led NATO escort framework can be activated in July. The single best read on why Khamenei’s uranium directive this morning lands the way it does.
☽

Evening Briefing

Wednesday 20 May 2026 — 18:30 BST

What It Means For You

  • At PMQs today Sir Keir Starmer extended the 5p fuel duty cut for the rest of 2026 and gave the haulage industry a twelve-month vehicle excise duty holiday, a package worth around £400 million which the Treasury will fully cost on Thursday. Kemi Badenoch claimed credit for a “U-turn”; Starmer told the Commons she had in her mind “won Eurovision on Saturday and scored the winning goal in the FA Cup final”. Rachel Reeves has separately dropped the supermarket food price cap push after a sharp retail backlash. The cabinet ring-fence around the Prime Minister continues to hold; the Burnham 18-June Makerfield campaign starts in earnest from tomorrow.
  • The Iran deal track held through the day. Vice President JD Vance said at the White House yesterday that the United States and Iran had made “a lot of progress” in talks and that “neither side wants to see a resumption of the military campaign”; Trump told reporters he had been “an hour away” from ordering the cancelled strike. Two Chinese supertankers exited the Strait of Hormuz this morning with four million barrels of crude. The Indian rupee hit a record low overnight on US-Iran stalemate fears; Brent eased further to $105.20 (-1.1%); the FTSE 100 closed up +0.14% at 8,302.
  • Andy Burnham gave his first sit-down television interview since the Makerfield confirmation, telling ITV News he “100%” understands why people want Starmer to step down: “they’re sending a message”. Burnham also said becoming an MP would be the “first step” on the path to a Labour leadership challenge. The cabinet ring-fence is operationally holding; the contest itself, when triggered, is now a question of when not whether. PMQs and the Burnham interview together marked the formal start of the 18 June by-election campaign.

GEO Geopolitical

Vance: “A Lot of Progress” in Iran Talks; Neither Side Wants Resumption

US Vice President JD Vance told a White House press briefing on Tuesday that the United States and Iran have made “a lot of progress” in their talks and that “neither side wants to see a resumption of the military campaign”. “We’re in a pretty good spot here,” Vance said. He acknowledged the difficulty of negotiating with a “fractured Iranian leadership”: “It’s not sometimes totally clear what the negotiating position of the team is”, adding that the US is trying to make its own red lines clear. One objective of the policy, Vance said, is to prevent a nuclear arms race spreading in the region.

Dive deeper
Vance’s framing — that the negotiating challenge is structural Iranian fragmentation rather than American intransigence — passes the responsibility for any breakdown onto Tehran. Trump’s parallel framing yesterday was sharper: “I was an hour away from making the decision to go today.” Iran’s leaders, Trump said, are “begging for a deal”. A new US attack would happen “in coming days” if no agreement is reached. Iran’s latest proposal terms (per Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi via IRNA) include ending hostilities on all fronts incl Lebanon; US troop exit from areas close to Iran; reparations; sanctions relief; release of frozen funds; end of US blockade. The terms are little changed from Iran’s previous offer, which Trump rejected last week as “garbage”.

Two Chinese Supertankers Exit Hormuz with 4m Barrels of Crude

Two Chinese supertankers, the Yuan Gui Yang and Ocean Lily, exited the Strait of Hormuz on Wednesday morning carrying approximately four million barrels of Iraqi crude oil. The exit was the first material commercial movement through the strait since Iran’s newly-established Persian Gulf Strait Authority began formalising its claimed transit authority on Sunday. Brent crude fell to as low as $110.16 a barrel on the news before regaining most of its losses; by the close it had eased further to $105.20, the lowest mark of the post-cancellation period.

Dive deeper
The PGSA framework claims that navigation through the designated Strait of Hormuz zone requires “full coordination” with Iran and that 1,500 vessels are currently waiting for Iranian permission to transit. The two Chinese supertankers exiting today are the most concrete demonstration that the formal Iranian framework is not, at present, operationally constraining all flows — though it is unclear what coordination, if any, accompanied this morning’s movements. The Institute for the Study of War yesterday assessed Iran is storing 42 million barrels of crude on aging floating tankers around Kharg Island and Chabahar Port (a 65% jump since the war began per Kpler), with onshore storage at 64% of capacity (Kayrros), leaving only a few weeks of production space. The Indian rupee hit a record low overnight as the US-Iran stalemate continued to stoke global inflation fears.

Iran Proposal Terms: Reparations, US Troop Exit, Sanctions Lifted

Iran’s latest peace proposal to end the war — as confirmed by Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi via IRNA news agency — comprises five linked demands: ending hostilities on all fronts including Lebanon; the exit of US forces from areas close to Iran; reparations for the destruction caused by the US-Israeli attacks; lifting of sanctions; release of frozen funds; and an end to the US marine blockade of Iranian ports. The terms are “little changed” from the proposal Trump rejected last week as “garbage”. Iran is also seeking enrichment-pause durations shorter than the 20-year US demand.

Dive deeper
A separate Reuters report (citing two Iranian officials May 18) added that Iran proposed diluting some of its highly enriched uranium and sending the rest to Russia, while maintaining a right to “reclaim it” if the United States violates the agreement. The US demand remains that Iran must hand over its HEU to the United States and dismantle Iranian nuclear facilities entirely. Ebrahim Azizi, head of the Iranian parliament’s national security committee, said on X that Trump’s pausing of the attack was due to the realisation that any move against Iran would mean “facing a decisive military response”. The Pakistani-mediated channel remains the active diplomatic track; Pakistani sources continue to say both sides “keep changing their goalposts”.

US Seized Iran-Linked Tanker Skywave in Indian Ocean

The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that the United States has seized an Iran-linked oil tanker, the Skywave, in the Indian Ocean, citing three US officials. The Skywave had been sanctioned by the United States in March for its role in transporting Iranian oil. The seizure is the second high-profile US blockade-related action of the negotiating window, following the US Treasury’s Monday designation of the Amin Exchange and 19 additional vessels linked to illicit Iranian oil exports. US Central Command has now redirected 88 commercial vessels and disabled four since the 13 April blockade began.

Dive deeper
The simultaneous escalation of US economic and physical-interdiction pressure on Iran — alongside Vance’s “pretty good spot” framing and Trump’s “hour away from going” line — is the textbook coercive-diplomacy posture: maximum pressure on the negotiating partner’s economic survival while publicly framing the outcome as imminent. The Institute for the Study of War yesterday flagged that some NATO countries are now considering a plan to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz beginning in early July if Iran’s blockade continues; the unanimous-support threshold for NATO action has not been reached. The Indian rupee’s overnight slide to a record low against the dollar is the most material macroeconomic signal of how the war is now pricing into Asian currencies and commodity markets.

Hezbollah’s FPV Drones Now Cause Majority of IDF Deaths in Lebanon

Hezbollah’s first-person view (FPV) drones now cause the majority of Israel Defense Forces deaths in southern Lebanon since the 16 April ceasefire began. Israeli public broadcaster Kan reports that Hezbollah FPV drones have affected between 70 and 80 percent of Israeli forces’ freedom of movement in southern Lebanon by restricting most units to nighttime movement and operations. Hezbollah is conducting an average of about 11 attacks per day, including resuming IED ambushes along the Qouzah axis in central southern Lebanon and the Taybeh-Qantara axis in the southeast on 13 May.

Dive deeper
Hezbollah’s current operations are designed to demoralise IDF soldiers, disrupt IDF freedom of movement, and instil fear in Israeli civilians to degrade Israeli political will. The group is publishing official-channel footage of its drone strikes — including targets on Iron Dome air defence batteries in northern Israel — to demonstrate the “unpreventable, easy to sustain, and reactive to Israeli military action” framing. Hezbollah Secretary General Naim Qassem has consistently demanded a full halt to IDF operations, Israel’s total withdrawal from Lebanon, and other terms as “non-negotiable”. The 45-day ceasefire extension from Friday began at midnight Sunday; the Israeli airstrike near Baalbeck on 17 May killing PIJ Bekaa Valley operations commander Wael Mahmoud Abdel Halim was the most significant Israeli operational signal of the post-extension period.

UK UK Domestic Politics

Starmer at PMQs: 5p Fuel Duty Freeze Extended; Haulier Tax Holiday

At Prime Minister’s Questions today Sir Keir Starmer announced an extension of the temporary 5p fuel duty cut for the rest of 2026 and a twelve-month vehicle excise duty holiday for the haulage industry. The package is expected to cost approximately £400 million; Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out the details on Thursday. “This is not our war, but while the parties opposite wanted to jump into it, Labour will always protect working people,” Starmer told the Commons. The Treasury said the freeze would have saved the average driver £120 over two years by the end of 2026; the one-year vehicle excise pause would save £600 for a typical heavy lorry.

Dive deeper
The 5p cut, first introduced by Rishi Sunak in 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, had been due to expire in September following Reeves’s autumn budget. The extension is funded as part of a wider Reeves cost-of-living package being unveiled Thursday. Kemi Badenoch claimed it was a U-turn caused by Conservative pressure; Starmer rejected the framing: “I know the leader of the opposition likes to claim responsibility for things that have got literally nothing to do with her. In her mind, she won Eurovision on Saturday and scored the winning goal in the FA Cup final.” Sky News political editor Beth Rigby described the session as an “open goal” for the opposition, with the challenges to Starmer’s leadership giving the Conservatives additional ammunition.

Reeves Drops Food Price Cap Push After Retail Backlash

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has dropped the Treasury push for UK supermarkets to agree voluntary food price caps after a sharp retail-industry backlash. Retail sources said in an interview that the proposal — which would have asked supermarkets to limit prices on twenty to fifty essential items including bread, milk, eggs and cheese — was “unjustified” and likely to push costs up across the board. The Independent framed the drop as Reeves having “dropped Soviet-style price caps”. The Tuesday-evening floating of the proposal in the Telegraph and Guardian was rebuffed within 24 hours.

Dive deeper
The Times had reported overnight that “Supermarket grocery prices could freeze to tackle soaring inflation rates”, suggesting Treasury was still seriously exploring the cap mechanic; the FT framing makes clear that has been abandoned for now. Sainsbury’s on 23 April had called for the UK government to step in to support the food sector to offset the impact of high energy costs caused by the Iran war — a framing that retail sources today read as exactly the opposite of what the proposed cap would deliver. The SNP’s pledge to use devolved public health powers to fix prices on twenty to fifty essential items in Scotland is now the only operational price-cap framework on the table.

Burnham to ITV: “100%” Understand Why People Want Starmer to Step Down

Andy Burnham gave his first sit-down television interview since being confirmed as Labour’s Makerfield by-election candidate, telling ITV News’s Daniel Hewitt today that he “100%” understands why people want Sir Keir Starmer to step down: “They’re sending a message.” Burnham also confirmed that becoming an MP would be the “first step” on the path to a Labour leadership challenge. “I’ve indicated always in my role as mayor that one day I will seek to return to Westminster,” he said. The interview marks the formal start of the 18 June by-election campaign and the operational beginning of the leadership-contest path.

Dive deeper
Burnham’s ITV framing — “they’re sending a message” — deliberately positions the 7 May local election results and the cabinet-resignation cycle as legitimate political signals that the government should respect, rather than as anti-Starmer noise to be dismissed. The framing is calibrated against Lammy’s Monday Sky News “back on the pitch after days of introspection” line and Nandy’s Sunday Kuenssberg “froth and nonsense” framing — both of which Burnham now politely contradicts. The Times/YouGov poll yesterday had Burnham 59-37 against Starmer in a head-to-head members’ ballot; the Independent reported 47% of Labour members would back Burnham for PM. The 18 June by-election begins with Reform UK’s “Plucky Plumber” Robert Kenyon as Burnham’s primary opponent and a Wigan-borough baseline of 24/25 council seats won by Reform two weeks ago.

Badenoch: “U-Turn”; Starmer Eurovision/FA Cup Final Riposte

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch sought to claim credit for the fuel-duty announcement at PMQs today, calling it a U-turn caused by her pressure on the government. Starmer rejected the framing in unusually sharp terms: “I know the leader of the opposition likes to claim responsibility for things that have got literally nothing to do with her. In her mind, she won Eurovision on Saturday and scored the winning goal in the FA Cup final.” Badenoch also pressed Starmer over Labour MPs having voted to ban new British oil and gas licences yesterday, framing the announcement as inconsistent with that vote.

Dive deeper
Sky News political editor Beth Rigby described today’s PMQs as an “open goal” for the opposition: the challenges to the prime minister’s leadership only gave the opposition further ammunition. The Independent’s “Five things we learned” PMQs analysis pointed to the fuel-duty extension as the substantive headline, but framed it within the wider leadership-crisis news cycle. The political effect is that the Conservative response is being framed by Number 10 as opportunistic rather than substantive, even as the structural Burnham challenge to Starmer continues to grow. Badenoch’s line about Labour MPs having voted to ban new British oil and gas licences yesterday is the most substantive counter-argument: that the fuel duty extension is internally inconsistent with the rest of the Labour energy programme.

Reeves Thursday: Cost-of-Living Package Details; Iran War Funding Question

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out the funding details for the £400 million fuel duty + vehicle excise package on Thursday, the Treasury announced as Starmer spoke. In quotes released to coincide with the announcement, Reeves said: “The war in Iran is pushing up fuel prices here at home but after strong growth at the beginning of the year, I am stepping in to protect people at the pump.” The framing — that the package is funded out of the “fastest-growing economy in the G7” growth dividend rather than fresh borrowing — will be the operational test for the gilts market through Thursday’s announcement window.

Dive deeper
The structural fiscal context tightens further: yesterday’s HS2 cost confirmation at £87.7-£102.7 billion, the IMF’s Monday warning to “stick to fiscal rules or risk market revolt”, and today’s £400 million fuel-duty package all push in the same direction, even as the political risk premium continues to come off gilts as the cabinet ring-fence holds. The ten-year gilt yield closed Wednesday at 5.08% — nearly half a point off Friday’s 5.18% panic peak. Sterling firmed to $1.3355. The autumn budget envelope, however, is the question: whether the Reeves growth-dividend funding mechanism actually delivers, or whether the Iran-war-driven fiscal pressure forces a return to the 5%+ gilt-yield environment, will be tested through Thursday’s announcement and the August market window.
One To Read

Planned Fuel Duty Rise to be Scrapped, Says Keir Starmer

The Guardian · Peter Walker’s clean account of today’s PMQs — the £400 million fuel-duty + haulier-tax package, the Starmer “Eurovision/FA Cup” riposte to Badenoch, the Reeves Thursday cost-of-living announcement, and the structural context that this is now the cabinet’s most substantive cost-of-living-during-Iran-war intervention. Read before tomorrow’s Reeves announcement window.
☼

Morning Briefing

Wednesday 20 May 2026 — 08:15 BST

What It Means For You

  • Two Chinese supertankers exited the Strait of Hormuz this morning carrying around four million barrels of crude. Trump told reporters yesterday he had been “an hour away” from ordering the cancelled strike; Vice President JD Vance said: “We’re in a pretty good spot here.” Brent has fallen to $106.40 (-0.8%) and gilt yields have softened further; the immediate market read is that the deal-or-strike binary is starting to resolve on the deal side.
  • Chancellor Rachel Reeves is today pressuring UK supermarkets to cap grocery prices to limit Iran-war inflation; the Guardian notes the SNP is pledging to use devolved public health powers to fix prices on 20-50 items in Scotland. Today’s PMQs will run head-to-head against the price-cap announcement and Burnham’s post-confirmation press round. The food inflation question is now the connective tissue between the Iran war and UK domestic politics; the autumn Budget envelope tightens further if cap mechanics are added on top of yesterday’s £102.7bn HS2 confirmation.
  • Iran is now storing oil on ten aging tankers around Kharg Island and Chabahar — 42 million barrels in floating storage (a 65% jump since the war began per Kpler), 64% onshore storage capacity (Kayrros), leaving only a few weeks of production space. Some NATO countries are reportedly considering escorting ships through the Strait of Hormuz beginning in early July if Iran’s blockade continues. The economic squeeze on Iran is real and accelerating — but ISW cautions that Iranian leaders “care little for the economic well-being of the Iranian people beyond the impact… on regime stability”.

GEO Geopolitical

Chinese Tankers Exit Hormuz with 4m Barrels; Trump-Vance Talk Up Deal

Two Chinese supertankers, Yuan Gui Yang and Ocean Lily, exited the Strait of Hormuz this morning carrying around four million barrels of Iraqi crude citing LSEG and Kpler data, brightening hopes that the US-Israeli conflict with Iran may soon be resolved. President Trump said the war would be over “very quickly”; Vice President JD Vance told reporters at a White House briefing: “We’re in a pretty good spot here.” Vance acknowledged the difficulty of negotiating with a “fractured Iranian leadership”: “It’s not sometimes totally clear what the negotiating position of the team is.” Brent crude fell to as low as $110.16 on the announcement before regaining most of its losses.

Dive deeper
Trump told reporters at the White House yesterday: “I was an hour away from making the decision to go today.” Iran’s leaders are “begging for a deal”, he said, adding a new US attack would happen “in coming days” if no agreement was reached. The Pakistani source mediating between the two sides said both sides “keep changing their goalposts”: “We don’t have much time.” The terms of Iran’s latest proposal (per Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi via IRNA): ending hostilities on all fronts including Lebanon; the exit of US forces from areas close to Iran; reparations for war damage; lifting of sanctions; release of frozen funds; and an end to the US marine blockade. The terms appeared little changed from Iran’s previous offer that Trump rejected last week as “garbage”.

Trump: “An Hour Away” from Strike; Iran Leaders “Begging for a Deal”

President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday that he had been “an hour away from making the decision to go today” on the cancelled US strike against Iran, before the joint intervention of the Qatari Emir, the Saudi Crown Prince and the Emirati President. Trump said Iran’s leaders are “begging for a deal” and a new US attack would happen in coming days if no agreement was reached. Ebrahim Azizi, head of the Iranian parliament’s national security committee, said on X that Trump’s pausing of the attack was due to the realisation that any move against Iran would mean “facing a decisive military response”.

Dive deeper
Trump is, “under intense political pressure at home to reach an accord” before the November congressional elections; his approval rating has “plummeted” with gasoline prices remaining elevated. The Wall Street Journal reported overnight that the US has seized an Iran-linked oil tanker, the Skywave, in the Indian Ocean — sanctioned by the US in March for its role in transporting Iranian oil. The US Treasury yesterday separately sanctioned the Amin Exchange and 19 vessels linked to illicit Iranian oil exports. US Central Command has now redirected 88 commercial vessels and disabled four since the blockade of Iranian ports began on 13 April. The Iran war, Trump and Netanyahu said at its launch, was designed to dismantle Iran’s nuclear programme, destroy its missile capabilities and create conditions for Iranians to topple their rulers; the war has yet to achieve any of those.

Iran Storing Oil on Aging Tankers; 42m Barrels Around Kharg, Chabahar

Iran has expanded its oil storage by reusing ten aging tankers to hold crude oil clustered around Kharg Island and Chabahar Port, citing United Against Nuclear Iran and the Financial Times. Maritime intelligence firm Kpler estimates Iran has 42 million crude oil barrels in floating storage in the Middle East — a 65 percent increase since the conflict began — with roughly 24 million additional barrels on empty tankers within the US blockade area. Energy intelligence firm Kayrros assesses Iran’s onshore storage has risen by about 10 million barrels to 64 percent capacity, leaving only a few weeks’ worth of oil production space.

Dive deeper
the storage strain as a real and accelerating economic constraint on the Iranian regime — but explicitly cautions that “Iranian leaders have proven that they care little for the economic well-being of the Iranian people beyond the impact the economic well-being of the people has on regime stability”. Domestic pressure indicators are nonetheless rising: President Masoud Pezeshkian on 19 May called for long-term planning to mitigate war-related economic impacts; officials warned of rising drug prices potentially fuelling public discontent; anti-regime media reported gasoline shortages and at least one localised worker protest over wages in Zanjan City in northwestern Iran. The US Treasury yesterday separately intensified pressure with sanctions on the Amin Exchange and blocking 19 vessels linked to illicit Iranian oil exports.

NATO Considers Hormuz Ship Escort Plan from Early July

A senior NATO official said on 19 May that some NATO countries support a plan to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz beginning in early July if Iran’s blockade continues. One NATO diplomat said several NATO countries support the idea, but that there is “not the required unanimous support to enact it”. The diplomat added some NATO countries remain reluctant to get involved in the conflict, but NATO is generally concerned about the economic consequences of keeping the strait closed. The escort plan would mark the first direct NATO operational involvement in the Iran war.

Dive deeper
The NATO escort plan is the second multi-state framework now under active consideration: the US Central Command blockade of Iranian ports is in its second month with 88 vessels redirected and four disabled, and Iran’s newly-established Persian Gulf Strait Authority claims 1,500 vessels are currently waiting for Iranian transit permission. The two Chinese supertankers (Yuan Gui Yang, Ocean Lily) that exited the strait this morning are the first commercial movement of any scale since the PGSA framework began on Sunday. The economic incentive driving NATO consideration is shared across European exposure: gas, oil, food and freight costs have all moved meaningfully against European consumers since the war began.

Iran Studied US Fighter-Jet Flight Patterns; Russia Likely Assisted

The New York Times, citing a US military official, reports that Iranian military commanders studied the flight patterns of US fighter jets and bombers, likely ahead of and throughout the recent war. The US official said the downing of a US F-15E and an A-10 on 3 April, and damage suffered to an F-35 on 19 March, indicated US flight patterns had become “too predictable”. The official added Russia may have supported the Iranian effort as part of a broader Russian effort to help Iran target US and allied assets; Russia also provided Iran with satellite imagery of US bases and modified Shahed drones during the conflict.

Dive deeper
the operational precedent: Serbian forces shot down a US Air Force F-117 Nighthawk in 1999 by studying predictable US ingress-and-egress routes and combining that intelligence with low-band radars. The US military, ISW assesses, is “aware of and could diagnose the issue of predictability during the ceasefire” given that a shootdown of an aircraft would presumably trigger an after-action review. The Wall Street Journal reported on 13 May that Iran is using “asymmetric warfare to inflict pain from a weakened position” — a posture that the F-15E, A-10 and F-35 incidents bear out. The Russian assistance dimension is the new diagnostic question: NATO escort planning, if it proceeds in July, would now be operating in an environment where Russian satellite assets are presumed to be supporting Iranian targeting of US aircraft.

UK UK Domestic Politics

Reeves Urges Supermarkets to Cap Food Prices; SNP Pledges Devolved Caps

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is today pressuring UK supermarkets to cap food prices in an attempt to limit the inflation unleashed by the Iran war; the Guardian frames the announcement as supermarkets being “urged to consider voluntary price caps on essential foods”. The Scottish National party pledged to use its devolved public health powers to fix prices on 20-50 essential items in Scotland — including bread, milk, cheese and eggs — setting up a parallel intervention if Westminster cannot deliver. The food-inflation question lands at PMQs today, having already been raised by Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey at the previous PMQs session.

Dive deeper
Davey told the Commons that food prices would rise by 10% this year as “farmers’ costs soar”, urging the government to introduce a “Good Food Bill” with long-term food security targets and farmer-investment provisions. The intervention is the first substantive cost-of-living policy announcement of the post-cabinet-ring-fence period: it lands in the same news cycle as yesterday’s £102.7bn HS2 cost confirmation, the 47-37 YouGov polling on the Burnham-Starmer leadership question, and the Lammy criminal-responsibility-age intervention. The cap mechanic is voluntary, not legislative; the SNP’s devolved framework is more directly operative and could provide a UK-wide test case if launched first.

Burnham Confirmed as Labour’s Makerfield Candidate; 18 June Vote

Andy Burnham was confirmed yesterday as Labour’s candidate for the 18 June Makerfield by-election after the party’s National Executive Committee rubber-stamped his selection. No other candidates had been shortlisted. Reform UK announced local plumber Robert Kenyon as its by-election candidate minutes later, with Nigel Farage framing the contest as “The Plucky Plumber taking on Open Borders Burnham”. Burnham used this morning’s post-confirmation media to set out his economic agenda, including ruling out any imminent EU return and recommitting to the fiscal rules. The contest formally begins today; the leadership question gates open on a Burnham Westminster win.

Dive deeper
Reform UK won 24 of 25 council seats in the Wigan borough, which contains the Makerfield constituency, at the local elections two weeks ago. Burnham himself won 66% of the vote in Wigan in the 2024 Greater Manchester mayoral election. Restore Britain (rightwing) has selected Rebecca Shepherd; the Greens are due to name their candidate Wednesday evening; the Conservatives within twenty-four hours. The Times/YouGov head-to-head poll yesterday showed Burnham winning 59% of a Labour members’ ballot against Sir Keir Starmer’s 37%. The Independent reported a parallel YouGov result that 47% of Labour members would back Burnham for prime minister. The contest now formally starts; the Reform “Brexit betrayal” leaflet attack — printing Burnham’s September 2025 conference “I want to rejoin” quote — is the operational test of his Monday Leeds “I respect Brexit” pivot.

HS2: £87.7-£102.7bn Cost Confirmed; Opening 2036-2039

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed in the Commons yesterday that HS2 will cost between £87.7 billion and £102.7 billion in 2025 prices — roughly double the previous government’s figure in 2019 terms — and that the first trains will not run between Old Oak Common and Birmingham Curzon Street until 2036-2039, up to six years late. Top speed has been cut from 360km/h to 320km/h, saving up to £2.5 billion. £44.2 billion has already been spent. Alexander said Labour inherited a “litany of failure”: “If it seems like an obscene increase in time and costs, it is because it is. If it seems like I’m angry, it is because I am.”

Dive deeper
HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Wild has been set a target of delivering the project by 2037 at a cost of £92.2 billion. The full Euston-Curzon Street service plus West Coast Main Line connection is not expected to run until 2040-2043. Two-thirds of the cost increase is attributed to the previous government’s underestimate, inefficient delivery and missed scope; one-third to inflation. The Alexander framing — that the announcement is the first substantive policy announcement of the new political week and is the diagnostic signal of Labour government “competence” against the leadership-crisis news cycle — is the lens through which the Tuesday-evening cabinet read it. Shadow Transport Minister Jerome Mayhew accepted overruns but called for “consequential legislative changes” to prevent recurrence.

Reform’s Kenyon: “Stepping Stone” Charge vs Burnham’s “Cambridge” Bio

Reform UK’s newly-unveiled Makerfield candidate Robert Kenyon — local plumber, army reservist, former NHS specialist technician — accused Andy Burnham of treating Makerfield as a “stepping stone”. Kenyon attacked “career politicians… parachuted into somewhere they have never even visited” in a Reform UK campaign video, drawing a contrast with Burnham’s Cambridge education and former special-adviser background. Nigel Farage said: “This is the ‘Plucky Plumber’ taking on ‘Open Borders Burnham’. Only Reform UK can beat Labour in this by-election. It is a David versus Goliath battle.”

Dive deeper
Kenyon came within 5,399 votes of Josh Simons in the 2024 general election. Burnham’s counter is that he spent his youth in Makerfield, which is close to his family home. The Reform UK pitch is the operational test of the “Brexit betrayal” framing now playing out across the Telegraph, Daily Mail, Daily Express and Daily Mirror Tuesday lead pages. The Wigan-borough Reform sweep of 24/25 council seats two weeks ago is the empirical baseline; the May 7 local-election polling will be the next reality-check on whether the Reform-vs-Burnham contest is genuinely competitive or whether Burnham’s Westminster name recognition dominates. Restore Britain’s Rebecca Shepherd will split Reform support; the Greens (Wednesday) and Conservatives (within 24 hours) will split anti-Labour and anti-Reform votes.

Lammy: Raise Age of Criminal Responsibility 10 to 14?

Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy is considering raising the age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales from 10 to as high as 14, The Times reported yesterday. The government is “eyeing” Scotland’s threshold, under which children cannot be charged with criminal offences before age 12, as a possible starting point. The announcement lands as the first substantive domestic-policy intervention of the cabinet-ring-fence week. The current threshold of 10 is among the lowest in Europe and below the UN-recommended minimum of 14; raising it would align England and Wales with the majority of European jurisdictions.

Dive deeper
The Council of Europe and the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child have repeatedly criticised the threshold. The proposal sits across the Home Office, Justice and Education briefs, has implications for prosecuting violent youth offenders such as the Southport killer, and would require legislation. The Lammy intervention is part of a broader pattern of substantive policy announcements through the week intended to shift the political news cycle away from the leadership question and toward delivery: Reeves’s supermarket-cap push today, Alexander’s HS2 reset yesterday, and the Lammy criminal-responsibility proposal all share the structural feature of taking a difficult question and surfacing it on the government’s terms. PMQs at noon today will test whether the cabinet ring-fence holds.
One To Read

Tankers Exit Hormuz as Trump, Vance Talk Up Iran Deal Prospects

Reuters · The single best account of last night’s pivot: Trump’s “an hour away” quote, Vance’s “pretty good spot” framing, the Iranian counterproposal terms via Deputy FM Kazem Gharibabadi, the WSJ Skywave tanker seizure, the “keep changing their goalposts” Pakistani-source line — and the operational test, the two Chinese supertankers Yuan Gui Yang and Ocean Lily exiting the strait with four million barrels of crude as the news broke. Read before the markets open.
☽

Evening Briefing

Tuesday 19 May 2026 — 18:30 BST

What It Means For You

  • Andy Burnham was formally confirmed today as Labour’s candidate for the 18 June Makerfield by-election — the Guardian reports the NEC rubber-stamped the selection with no other candidates shortlisted. Reform UK unveiled local plumber Robert Kenyon minutes later, with Nigel Farage framing the contest as “The Plucky Plumber taking on Open Borders Burnham”. The Independent reports a parallel YouGov poll showing 47% of Labour members would back Burnham for prime minister. The contest now formally starts; the immediate question is whether Burnham’s “ruling out any imminent EU return” pivot and his recommitment to the fiscal rules hold through the campaign.
  • Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed in the Commons today that HS2 will cost between £87.7 billion and £102.7 billion in 2025 prices — roughly double the previous government’s figure in 2019 terms — and that the first trains will not run until 2036-2039, up to six years late. Top speed is being cut from 360km/h to 320km/h. Alexander’s framing – “If it seems like I’m angry, it is because I am” – positions the Labour government as inheriting a Conservative failure; the structural fiscal envelope for the autumn Budget tightens further.
  • The Iran situation is in a holding pattern. President Trump’s “two or three days” window holds; the Jerusalem Post carries new analysis from the German Institute for International and Security Affairs that any renewed war would see Iran fire “tens or hundreds of missiles a day” at Israel and target Gulf oil infrastructure to drag the Gulf states into a war they have explicitly sought to avoid. Unexplained explosions were reported on Iran’s Qeshm island. Brent eased modestly to $107.30; the immediate strike risk premium continues to come off.

GEO Geopolitical

JPost/NYT: Iran Could Fire “Hundreds of Missiles a Day” if War Renews

Hamidreza Azizi of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs said in an interview yesterday that if hostilities resume, Iran may fire “tens or hundreds of missiles per day” at Israel and the United States to “effectively confront the enemy and also change the calculation on the other side”, the Jerusalem Post reported this morning. Azizi assessed that Iranian leaders are now planning for a “short but high intensity” war — in contrast to the February-onset campaign in which they rationed missiles for several weeks — and would deliberately target Gulf oil fields, refineries and ports to drag the Gulf states into a war they have explicitly sought to avoid.

Dive deeper
Azizi separately assessed that Iran could leverage the Bab al-Mandab Strait, via the Houthis, to force the United States to focus on two maritime fronts simultaneously. The Bab al-Mandab connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean and is already considered a significant vulnerability. The JPost cited Yemen expert Inbal Nissim-Louvton, who has previously argued that fears of Houthi disruption of the Bab al-Mandab have likely led Gulf nations to “absorb Iranian attacks without responding in kind”. Trump’s Truth Social post said “there seems to be a very good chance that they can work something out. If we can do that without bombing the hell out of them, I would be very happy” — but added the US military stands ready for a “full, large-scale assault of Iran, on a moment’s notice” if a deal is not reached.

Iran: Explosions on Qeshm Island in Strait of Hormuz; Cause Unknown

Explosions were heard on Iran’s Qeshm island in the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday, the Jerusalem Post reported, citing the semi-official Iranian Mehr news agency, which said the cause was unknown and no further details were available. Qeshm is the largest island in the Persian Gulf and a major Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy base; it sits directly on the strait through which Iran’s newly-established Persian Gulf Strait Authority claims to control transit. No official Iranian comment has been issued; no claim of responsibility was made; Western intelligence assessments are pending. The incident comes in the third day of Trump’s “two or three day” pause on the cancelled US strike.

Dive deeper
The Qeshm explosions are the first reported incident on Iranian territory since Trump’s Truth Social cancellation Monday night and add an additional unverified variable to the negotiating posture. Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA), established yesterday, claims that navigation through the designated zone of the Strait of Hormuz requires “full coordination” with the authority; Iranian state media report 1,500 vessels currently waiting for Iranian permission to transit. The Institute for the Study of War, citing Articles 37, 38 and 44 of UNCLOS, judges Iran’s claim incorrect: the Strait of Hormuz is an international strait with a right of transit passage that bordering states are prohibited from hampering. US Central Command says it has now redirected 85 commercial vessels and disabled four since the 13 April blockade began.

Trump: “No Nuclear Weapons for Iran”; Hegseth + Caine Stand Ready

President Donald Trump’s Truth Social cancellation of last night’s scheduled US military strike against Iran — at the joint request of the Qatari Emir, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Emirati President Mohamed bin Zayed — included a sharply more substantive sentence than the headline cancellation, the Jerusalem Post reported: “This Deal will include, importantly, NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS FOR IRAN!” Trump instructed Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Daniel Caine and the US military to remain prepared for a “full, large-scale assault of Iran, on a moment’s notice, in the event that an acceptable Deal is not reached”.

Dive deeper
Trump’s framing — “Serious negotiations are now taking place, and that, in their opinion, as Great Leaders and Allies, a Deal will be made, which will be very acceptable to the United States of America” — passes responsibility for the breakdown, if there is one, onto Iran rather than onto the Gulf intermediaries or the negotiating team. The Trump “NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS FOR IRAN” line is the most explicit US red-line statement of the post-ceasefire period and is materially incompatible with Iran’s public position that any deal requires recognition of Iranian sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, lifting of sanctions, end of the US blockade, war reparations and a halt to Israeli operations in Lebanon. The Institute for the Study of War continues to assess the two sides’ positions as “fundamentally incompatible”.

Iran: 1,500 Vessels Waiting for Hormuz Permission; Cables Threat Continues

The Iranian regime’s newly-established Persian Gulf Strait Authority continues to formalise its claim to manage transit through the Strait of Hormuz, with Iranian state media reporting that 1,500 vessels are currently waiting for Iranian permission to transit. IRGC-affiliated Fars News Agency repeated yesterday’s threat that Iran could impose permits, oversight measures and sovereign fees on the subsea fibre-optic cables running through the strait — a step that would breach Articles 37, 38 and 44 of UNCLOS. The cables affected include AAE-1, FALCON, GBICS and OMRAN/EPEG.

Dive deeper
Three of the seven major subsea cables running through the Strait of Hormuz connect directly to Iran (FALCON, GBICS, OMRAN/EPEG); IRGC-affiliated Javan News has previously warned that simultaneous damage to several major subsea cables, including through “deliberate actions”, could cause widespread disruptions to communications and digital infrastructure between Asia, the Gulf and Europe. The cables carry a significant share of internet and financial-messaging traffic between South Asia, the Gulf and Europe; their integrity has been treated as a notional Iranian leverage since the war began. The PGSA formalisation, combined with the Tuesday Qeshm incident, suggests Iran is escalating its Hormuz posture even as the diplomatic track via Pakistan continues.

Russia Hits Ukraine with 546 Drones, Missiles; Belarus-Russia Begin Nuclear Drills

The Institute for the Study of War confirms that Russian forces launched 546 drones and missiles at Ukraine overnight on 17-18 May, including 14 ballistic missiles and 8 cruise missiles, with 18 missiles and 16 drones striking 34 locations primarily across Dnipropetrovsk, Chernihiv, Kharkiv, Kirovohrad, Kherson and Odesa oblasts. A Chinese-owned ship approaching the port of Odesa was hit. At least 33 civilians were injured, including three children. Russia and Belarus simultaneously began joint nuclear-weapon exercises on 18 May — the most explicit Russian nuclear-signalling event of the year.

Dive deeper
The Belarusian Ministry of Defence said its forces are practising delivering nuclear munitions and preparing for combat use in coordination with Russian forces. Russia is now launching larger volumes of ballistic missiles to exploit Ukrainian air defence limits, given a global shortage of Patriot interceptors. President Volodymyr Zelensky said Ukraine’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SZRU) has obtained Russian documents showing one Russian oil company alone has closed 400 active wells, refining has fallen 10% in 2026, 11 Russian financial institutions are preparing to liquidate, and Russia’s federal budget deficit is already almost $80 billion in the first five months of the year. Ukraine’s Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov announced the first domestically-produced KAB-style guided glide bomb is ready for combat use, with a 250kg payload.

UK UK Domestic Politics

Burnham Confirmed as Labour’s Makerfield Candidate; 18 June Vote

Andy Burnham was today confirmed as Labour’s candidate for the Makerfield by-election expected on 18 June, after Labour’s National Executive Committee rubber-stamped his selection. The party said no other candidates had been shortlisted for the seat vacated by Josh Simons. Burnham said in a statement that he was “humbled” to be selected; that the Makerfield communities had been “neglected by national politics for too long”; that the people there “feel Westminster isn’t working for them and they are right”; and that the priority was making “life more affordable again”. He is widely expected to challenge Sir Keir Starmer for the leadership if elected.

Dive deeper
The selection coincides with the Independent’s reporting today of a YouGov poll showing 47% of Labour members would back Burnham for prime minister, against Sir Keir Starmer at significantly lower numbers — broadly consistent with the Times/YouGov head-to-head poll yesterday showing Burnham 59% to Starmer 37% in a direct ballot. Allies of the mayor said in an interview he would use this week to set out his economic agenda, to rule out any imminent EU return, and to recommit to the fiscal rules on borrowing and debt — the same three-step pivot framed in this morning’s FT “Burnham tries to ease markets” lead. The Greens will name a candidate Wednesday evening; the Conservatives within 24 hours.

Reform Unveils “Plucky Plumber” Kenyon; Farage Frames David vs Goliath

Reform UK unveiled local plumber Robert Kenyon as its Makerfield by-election candidate minutes after Burnham’s confirmation. Kenyon — an army reservist and former NHS specialist technician in Lancashire — came within 5,399 votes of Josh Simons in 2024. Nigel Farage said: “This is the ‘Plucky Plumber’ taking on ‘Open Borders Burnham’. Only Reform UK can beat Labour in this by-election. It is a David versus Goliath battle.” Kenyon, in a Reform video, accused Burnham of treating Makerfield as a “stepping stone” and attacked “career politicians… parachuted into somewhere they have never even visited”.

Dive deeper
Reform won 24 of 25 council seats in the Wigan borough — which contains the Makerfield constituency — at the local elections two weeks ago. Burnham himself won 66% of the vote in Wigan in the 2024 Greater Manchester mayoral. The Restore Britain rightwing party has selected local businesswoman Rebecca Shepherd as a Reform-attacking spoiler candidate; the Greens are due to unveil their candidate tomorrow and the Conservatives within twenty-four hours. The Kenyon “stepping stone” framing is exactly the diagnostic line the Telegraph and Mail were building yesterday: that Burnham is a Cambridge-educated former special adviser more rooted in Westminster than the seat he is contesting. Burnham’s own framing — that he spent his youth in Makerfield, which is close to his family home — is the counter.

HS2: £87.7-£102.7bn Cost, Opening Pushed to 2036-2039

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed in the Commons today that the HS2 high-speed rail line will cost between £87.7 billion and £102.7 billion in 2025 prices — roughly double the previous government’s figure in 2019 terms — and that the first trains will not run between Old Oak Common and Birmingham Curzon Street until 2036-2039, up to six years late. The top speed has been cut from the original 360km/h to 320km/h, saving up to £2.5 billion and allowing delivery a year earlier. £44.2 billion has already been spent. Alexander said Labour had inherited a “litany of failure”; “If it seems like an obscene increase in time and costs, it is because it is. If it seems like I’m angry, it is because I am.”

Dive deeper
HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Wild has been set a target of delivering the project by 2037 at a cost of £92.2 billion. The full Euston-Curzon Street service plus West Coast Main Line connection is not expected to run until 2040-2043. Two-thirds of the cost increase is attributed to the previous government’s underestimate, inefficient delivery and missed scope; one-third to inflation. Shadow Transport Minister Jerome Mayhew accepted the early years had been beset with overruns but called for “consequential legislative changes” to prevent recurrence. Andy Meaney, who contributed to the Oakervee HS2 review, said the speed reduction “should have been taken a long time ago”. The original 2012 plan ran to Manchester and Leeds at £42.6 billion; both legs were cancelled by Conservative prime ministers Boris Johnson (Leeds, 2021) and Rishi Sunak (Manchester, 2023).

Alexander: “I’m Angry”; “Litany of Failure” Inherited from Tories

The Transport Secretary’s Commons statement on HS2 today set the Labour government’s framing on inherited infrastructure failure with unusual sharpness: “Instead of signalling the country’s ambition, HS2 became a signal of the country’s decline.” “If it seems like I’m angry, it is because I am.” Heidi Alexander told the Commons it could now cost “almost as much to cancel the line as it would to finish it, while delivering none of the benefits”. The cost framing — a£100bn rail project versus NASA’s £79bn Artemis Moon mission’s lead on Tuesday — is the political variable for the autumn Budget.

Dive deeper
Alexander’s “litany of failure” line is the most explicit Cabinet-level attack yet on the Conservative government’s capital-programme management, and is timed precisely against the leadership-crisis news cycle: the announcement delivers a domestic-policy “signal of competence” on a Tuesday that began with a 47%-Labour-members-back-Burnham YouGov poll and the Tuesday papers’ lead on the Burnham “two u-turns in one day” framing. Earlier that the leadership-political-risk premium had begun to come off gilt yields on Monday; today’s HS2 cost confirmation will push the structural wartime-fiscal premium back in the other direction. Mark Wild’s £92.2bn / 2037 internal target gives the government a metric to be measured against quarter by quarter for the remainder of the parliament.

Lammy: Raise Age of Criminal Responsibility from 10 to 14?

Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy is considering lifting the age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales from 10 to as high as 14, The Times reported this morning. The government is “eyeing Scotland’s law”, under which children cannot be charged with criminal offences before age 12, as a possible starting point. The intervention — the first substantive domestic-policy announcement of the new political week — lands alongside the cabinet’s public ring-fence around the Prime Minister, with Lammy yesterday morning on Sky News saying “there will be no timetable for departure” and that the party needed to “get back on the pitch”.

Dive deeper
The current age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales is 10 — among the lowest in Europe and below the UN-recommended minimum of 14. The Council of Europe and the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child have repeatedly criticised the threshold; raising it would align England and Wales with the majority of European jurisdictions. The proposal is politically delicate: it sits across the Home Office, Justice and Education briefs, has potential implications for prosecuting violent youth offenders such as the Southport killer, and would require legislation. The Lammy intervention is part of the broader cabinet pattern of substantive policy announcements through the week intended to shift the political news cycle away from the leadership question and toward delivery.
One To Read

Andy Burnham Confirmed as Labour Candidate for Makerfield By-Election

The Guardian · Jessica Elgot and Ben Quinn’s clean account of today’s NEC confirmation, the Reform UK Robert Kenyon “Plucky Plumber” counter-announcement, the Wigan-borough Reform sweep of 24/25 council seats two weeks ago, and the precise three-step pivot Burnham allies say he will execute this week: rule out imminent EU return, recommit to fiscal rules, set out the economic agenda. The single best read on how the 18 June by-election now formally starts.
☼

Morning Briefing

Tuesday 19 May 2026 — 08:15 BST

What It Means For You

  • President Donald Trump cancelled the scheduled US military strike on Iran that had been set for today, announcing on Truth Social late last night that the Qatari Emir, Saudi Crown Prince and Emirati President asked him to suspend for “two or three days” while negotiations continue. The Gulf leaders warned, per Axios, that they would “pay the price” if the strike went ahead. Trump kept the US military prepared for a “full, large-scale assault” on short notice if talks fail. Brent has eased to $107.95 (-2.0%) and the FTSE 100 is set to open firmer; the immediate war risk premium is coming off across asset classes — but this is a three-day window, not a settlement.
  • Russian forces launched the largest single overnight strike on Ukraine in over a month, the Institute for the Study of War confirms: 546 drones and missiles, including 14 ballistic missiles, with 18 missiles and 16 drones striking 34 locations primarily across Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. A Chinese-owned ship approaching Odesa was hit. Belarus and Russia simultaneously began joint nuclear-weapon exercises — the strongest Russian signalling response yet to Ukraine’s 16-17 May strikes on Moscow.
  • Sir Keir Starmer’s Tuesday morning is dominated by a YouGov poll in The Times showing Burnham would defeat him 59% to 37% in a head-to-head leadership ballot of Labour members; the Daily Mail’s “Slippery Burnham’s two u-turns in one day” on Brexit and the fiscal rules now defines the Burnham-pitch counter-narrative. On Burnham’s pledge to “not rip up the fiscal rules” — markets will price that as the most material variable today.

GEO Geopolitical

Trump Cancels Iran Strike at Gulf Leaders’ Request; “Two or Three Days”

President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social on 18 May that he has cancelled the scheduled US military strike against Iran that had been planned for today. Trump said Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al Thani, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Emirati President Mohamed bin Zayed had asked him to suspend the strike “for two or three days” to allow ongoing negotiations. CNBC quoted Trump: “We will NOT be doing the scheduled attack of Iran tomorrow.” A US official told Axios the three Gulf leaders warned they would “pay the price” if the strike went ahead, fearing Iranian retaliation against their energy and oil infrastructure.

Dive deeper
Trump nevertheless instructed US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine and the US military to remain prepared to launch a “full, large-scale assault” against Iran on short notice if negotiations fail. The Gulf leaders, Trump said, believe the US and Iran can reach a deal “very acceptable to the United States” that prevents Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. The cancellation reverses what was described as the most imminent strike posture of the post-ceasefire period: yesterday’s Defence Minister Israel Katz statement that the IDF was “awaiting a green light from the United States”, and last week’s NYT reporting of intense renewal preparations. The three-day window is the operational variable; the Pakistani-mediated proposal handed to Washington yesterday is the diplomatic one.

Iran’s Counterproposal “Does Not Meet” US Demands on Enrichment

the revised Iranian counterproposal handed to the US through Pakistan on Monday “does not appear to meet US demands”. A senior US official and a source briefed on the matter told Axios that Iran’s counterproposal does not contain any commitment about suspending uranium enrichment or handing over its existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium — the central US demand. The US official said the Trump administration considers Iran’s proposal “insufficient”. IRGC-affiliated media said “major disagreements” remain and that Iran would never accept “an end to the war in return for nuclear commitments”.

Dive deeper
The US demands, ISW reports, are that Iran must transfer its highly enriched uranium to the United States, dismantle its nuclear facilities and pause uranium enrichment for at least 20 years. Iran’s position, articulated by IRGC Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari on 11 May and re-stated this week, is that any deal must include an end to the war on “all fronts”, the lifting of sanctions, the release of frozen Iranian assets, compensation for war-related damages and recognition of Iranian sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz. ISW’s 17 May framing remains in place: “The United States and Iran continue to pursue fundamentally incompatible negotiating positions.” The two-or-three-day Gulf-requested pause is the operational test.

Iran Establishes Persian Gulf Strait Authority; Threatens Hormuz Subsea Cables

Iran is formalising and institutionalising its claimed control over transit through the Strait of Hormuz in contravention of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The newly established Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA) stated on X yesterday that it serves as the “legal institution and representative authority” for managing transit through the strait, claims that navigation through the designated zone requires “full coordination” with the authority, and warns that unauthorised transit will be considered illegal. Iranian state media reports 1,500 vessels currently waiting for Iranian permission to transit. IRGC-affiliated Fars News said Iran could impose “permits, oversight measures, and sovereign fees” on subsea fibre-optic cables.

Dive deeper
The major subsea cables running through the Strait of Hormuz include AAE-1 (Asia-Africa-Europe 1), FALCON and the Gulf Bridge International Cable System — three of which (FALCON, GBICS, OMRAN/EPEG) connect directly to Iran. IRGC-affiliated Javan News has previously warned that simultaneous damage to several major subsea cables, including through “deliberate actions”, could cause widespread disruptions to communications and digital infrastructure between Asia, the Gulf and Europe. Iran’s assertion that the Strait of Hormuz lies within its territorial waters is incorrect under Articles 37, 38 and 44 of UNCLOS, which establish the Strait of Hormuz as an international strait with right of transit passage and prohibit bordering states from hampering passage. US Central Command said yesterday that US forces have now redirected 85 commercial vessels and disabled four since the 13 April blockade began.

Russia Hits Ukraine with 546 Drones and Missiles; Belarus-Russia Begin Nuclear Drills

Russian forces conducted the largest single overnight strike on Ukraine in more than a month, launching 546 drones and missiles on the night of 17-18 May, the Institute for the Study of War confirms. The package included 14 Iskander-M ballistic missiles and S-400 air defence missiles repurposed for surface strike, 8 Iskander-K cruise missiles, and 524 Shahed, Gerbera, Italmas and Parodiya drones. Ukrainian air defences downed 4 cruise missiles and 503 drones; 18 missiles and 16 drones struck 34 locations across Dnipropetrovsk, Chernihiv, Kharkiv, Kirovohrad, Kherson and Odesa oblasts. A Chinese-owned ship approaching the port of Odesa was hit. Russia and Belarus simultaneously began joint nuclear-weapon exercises on 18 May.

Dive deeper
President Volodymyr Zelensky said the strikes “significantly damaged civilian infrastructure” and also targeted energy and residential infrastructure; at least 33 civilians were injured, including three children. Russia has been launching larger volumes of ballistic missiles in recent weeks to exploit Ukrainian air defence limits given a global shortage of Patriot interceptors. The Belarusian Ministry of Defence said its forces are practising delivering nuclear munitions and preparing for combat use in coordination with Russian forces — the strongest single Russian nuclear-signalling event of the year. Separately, Ukraine’s Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov announced the first domestically-produced KAB-style guided glide bomb is ready for combat use, with a 250kg payload and a range of tens of kilometres — mirroring Russia’s glide-bomb capability.

Zelensky/SZRU: 11 Russian Banks Preparing to Liquidate; 400 Oil Wells Closed

President Volodymyr Zelensky said on 18 May that Ukraine’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SZRU) has obtained Russian documents showing that one unspecified Russian oil company alone has had to close 400 active oil wells, Russia has reduced oil refining by at least 10% so far in 2026, 11 Russian financial institutions are preparing to liquidate and another 8 banking institutions cannot internally resolve their accumulated problems. Russia’s federal budget deficit is already almost $80 billion in the first five months of 2026. Russian Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov also publicly conceded labour shortages and sanctions are now forcing downward GDP revisions.

Dive deeper
this as the compounding effect of Ukraine’s intensifying long-range strike campaign on Russian oil and refining infrastructure since March 2026: the strikes on the Moscow Oil Refinery and the Solnechnogorsk and Volodarsk oil pumping stations confirmed in ISW’s 17 May assessment fit this pattern. Russia has resorted to selling its physical gold reserves and increasing the value-added tax (VAT) in January 2026, which has expanded the “shadow” (gray) economy and pushed up costs without generating the desired tax revenues. The Russian Minister of Economic Development’s admission that labour shortages constrain the economy contradicts President Putin’s ongoing public framing of low unemployment as a sign of strength.

UK UK Domestic Politics

The Times/YouGov: Burnham 59%, Starmer 37% in Head-to-Head Members’ Ballot

The Times leads its Tuesday front page with a YouGov poll showing Andy Burnham would defeat Sir Keir Starmer 59% to 37% in a head-to-head ballot of Labour Party members, the BBC Newspaper Review reports. The poll lands as the cabinet’s public ring-fence around the Prime Minister starts to look operational rather than substantive: Sir Keir’s “I won’t walk away” leads the Daily Mirror’s front page; the Daily Telegraph runs “Starmer sabotages Burnham on Brexit”; the Daily Mail leads with “Slippery Burnham’s two u-turns in one day” under a “Labour’s civil war” banner; the Guardian: “Burnham: Labour must change to regain trust”.

Dive deeper
The 22-point margin in the Times poll is the largest documented since the question began being asked in early May, and is consistent with the steady drift towards a Burnham-led party across both the parliamentary right (now with Streeting’s 16 May leadership declaration) and the Labour membership. The political risk premium that the FT credited yesterday for the partial gilts stabilisation should be re-priced in light of the Times poll: a Burnham challenge, if triggered, would not be a contest the Prime Minister could plausibly win on members’ votes. The Lammy intervention on Sky News, the Nandy Sunday morning intervention and Starmer’s own Monday refusal to set a timetable now look like a tactical, not strategic, hold.

Burnham Tries to Ease Markets; Won’t “Rip Up Fiscal Rules”

With Andy Burnham’s pledge to “reassure markets he will not rip up the UK’s fiscal rules”, even while vowing to “reverse privatisation and austerity”. The paper reports that Burnham’s remarks were specifically designed to “reassure investors that he would not embark on irresponsible borrowing policies” ahead of the Makerfield selection. Sterling firmed modestly into the Tuesday open at $1.3310 and ten-year gilt yields softened from Friday’s 5.18% closing peak; the FT’s framing is that the political risk premium is now coming off, but the structural wartime-fiscal premium remains.

Dive deeper
The Daily Mail’s framing — “Slippery Burnham’s two u-turns in one day” — captures the diagnostic dilemma: the Burnham pitch combines a redistributionist Labour-left domestic programme (public ownership, “serious rewiring”, reverse-Thatcherism) with explicit fiscal-rule discipline. The two are not obviously compatible; the markets will price the gap. The FT separately reports that gilts stabilised through Monday after the cabinet voiced support for Starmer, citing investor relief that political turmoil is not, for the moment, accelerating. The IMF, per The Times yesterday, warned Labour to “stick to fiscal rules or risk market revolt” — a frame the Burnham pitch now publicly accepts.

“Starmer Sabotages Burnham” on Brexit; Rejoin Prospect Raised

The Daily Telegraph leads Tuesday with “Starmer sabotages Burnham on Brexit”. The paper writes that Sir Keir Starmer “has raised the prospect of rejoining the EU” while Burnham “seeks to keep Leave voters on side”, despite Burnham’s previous explicit desire to reverse the 2016 referendum. Sir Keir has been pursuing closer ties with the bloc but has stuck to Labour’s election manifesto pledges to “stay outside the EU”, with “no return to the single market, the customs union, or freedom of movement”. The Telegraph framing brackets the Streeting-Burnham EU split with a now-strategic Number 10 reading.

Dive deeper
The Telegraph’s positioning is the most aggressive editorial reading yet of Sir Keir’s Monday EU-related interventions: where Reform UK plans to print Burnham’s 2025 conference “I want to rejoin” line on Makerfield by-election leaflets, the Telegraph argues, the Prime Minister’s own EU rapprochement undercuts Burnham’s Leeds-speech retreat. The Daily Mail’s “Labour’s civil war” banner and the Independent’s Sunday “Brexit wars” framing complete the picture: the Streeting weekend declaration, the Burnham Monday retreat, and the Telegraph Tuesday charge that Starmer is exploiting both. Whether the politics holds depends on whether Reform UK’s “Brexit betrayal” leaflet attack actually moves Makerfield votes.

Mirror: Starmer’s “Defiant Message”; “I Won’t Walk Away”

The Daily Mirror leads Tuesday with “Starmer’s defiant message: I won’t walk away”, the BBC Newspaper Review reports, quoting Sir Keir as “defiant” and saying he “rejects call to set out departure timetable” despite pressure from Labour MPs and senior ministers. The Daily Mirror also embeds the now-viral “best of buddies” photograph of Alan Titchmarsh, David Beckham and King Charles III at the Chelsea Flower Show. The Times reports that Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy has floated lifting the age of criminal responsibility “from ten to as high as 14” in England and Wales, mirroring Scotland’s law where children cannot be charged before turning 12.

Dive deeper
The cabinet ring-fence is now public and operational: Lammy on Sky News yesterday morning, Nandy on the Laura Kuenssberg programme on Sunday, the Starmer broadcast lines yesterday afternoon, and now today’s Lammy criminal-responsibility-age intervention. The Times poll showing Burnham 59-37 against Starmer in a members’ ballot is the structural counter-pressure on that ring-fence. The Mirror’s “buddies” photograph plays as an attempted soft re-launch of the King-Beckham relationship; the same Royal-style symbolism, the Sun’s “Katie Price’s conman” lead and the Star’s “Jezza’s heart op” lead remind readers how brittle the political crisis cycle is for the broadsheet papers compared to the rest of Fleet Street.

i Paper: HS2 to Cost More than NASA’s Artemis Moon Mission

The i Paper leads Tuesday with Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander’s planned release today of a review on HS2 showing the “stripped back high-speed link” will become “the most expensive rail line in the world”, with delays and higher costs set to reach around £100 billion — more than NASA’s £79 billion projected cost for the Artemis programme to land astronauts on the Moon. The BBC’s Newspaper Review reports the Alexander announcement is timed to take a domestic-policy story into the Tuesday news cycle alongside the leadership question. The Daily Express separately reports that 66% of Britons want to keep the pension triple lock.

Dive deeper
The HS2 figure is the latest in a sequence of public-spending headlines that frame the autumn Budget environment: the IMF’s Monday warning to Labour to “stick to fiscal rules or risk market revolt”, the Sunday Times’ “Raynernomics” framing, and now the i’s £100bn HS2 lead all push in the same direction. The Express triple-lock survey is the diagnostic measure of how protected pensioner spending has become as a political variable, even as the war wartime-fiscal premium pushes gilt yields to multi-decade highs. Heidi Alexander’s review is expected to recommend further cost-control measures and is the first major substantive policy announcement from the government in nine days of leadership crisis.
One To Read

Iran Update Special Report, 18 May 2026

Institute for the Study of War · The most analytically rigorous account of last night’s Trump cancellation: the three Gulf leaders, the “two or three days” window, the “pay the price” warning, and the operational standing instruction to Hegseth and Caine to remain prepared for a “full, large-scale assault” on short notice. Also the single best framing of Iran’s simultaneous PGSA-and-subsea-cables formalisation of Hormuz control. This is the document the entire day’s market and diplomatic moves will be priced against.
● Live Updates · Auto-aggregated from 16 sources

Geopolitical

LIVE World affairs, diplomacy & conflict

UK Domestic Politics

LIVE Westminster, policy & governance

The Daily Brief

Live Updates RSS feeds aggregated from BBC, Sky News, Al Jazeera, Reuters, The Telegraph, Financial Times, The Independent & The Economist
Curated briefings published at 08:00 & 18:00 BST

Privacy Policy Terms of Service Cookie Policy Subscription Terms
@thedailybriefuk

© 2026 The Daily Brief

Premium Subscriptions

Coming Soon

Be the first to know when premium launches. Enter your email and we'll notify you.

We respect your privacy. See our Privacy Policy.

This site uses localStorage for functionality (theme, bookmarks, dismissed alerts). No cookies or tracking are used. Analytics are provided by Cloudflare Web Analytics, which is cookieless and privacy-first. Learn more